Reviewer Recognition platform
Reviewers can now list all their review history in one place
By Dr. Bahar Mehmani, Dr. Joris van Rossum and Ursula van Dijk Posted on 23 September 2015
Our latest functionality to the Reviewer Recognition platform enables reviewers to create a public Reviewer Page, listing all their respective peer review activities. In a few simple steps, reviewers can indicate by year, all the reviews they have completed, regardless of the publisher and whether the reviewed manuscript was ultimately published or not. In this way, reviewers can create a complete overview of their review history accessible via a personalized URL. Naturally, we fully respect the confidentiality of the peer review process and will not match reviewers to individual articles.
Reviewer Recognition Platform
Enabling reviewers to:
- Track their reviewer status
- Access an annual review history report
- Claim discounts for books and author services purchases
- Collect certificates of recognition
- Volunteer to review for other journals
- Claim peer reviews for non-Elsevier journals
This year we also implemented the reviewer “end of the year report”, which collects the journal review history of a reviewer in a single PDF-file format. According to our feedback surveys, such a report is valuable when submitting a grant application or applying for a position.
Another feature recently added to the platform is the option for reviewers to volunteer to review for additional journals. Since the launch of this feature in March 2015, we have seen thousands of reviewers provide their authorship history, as well as their reason for volunteering, to journal editors.
“Peer review forms the cornerstone of trusted research outcome validation,” says Philippe Terheggen, Managing Director of Elsevier’s journal business. “Through the Reviewer Recognition platform, and the recently launched public Reviewer Page specifically, we want to ensure that reviewers get the recognition they deserve”.
For more information please visit http://www.reviewerpage.com/.
Dr. Bahar Mehmani, Publishing Innovation Manager at Elsevier, is working on a number of reviewer-related projects, all of which are designed to recognize reviewers' contribution to the progress of science. She received her PhD in Theoretical Physics from the University of Amsterdam in 2010. Before joining Elsevier, she was a postdoc researcher at Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light.
For the past 12 years, Dr. Joris van Rossum has been involved with the launch and further development of many products and initiatives within Elsevier. From its inception he was a Product Manager for Scopus, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, and he worked on Elsevier's search engine for scientific information as Head of Scirus. Later, he developed the Elsevier WebShop, which offers support and services for authors at many stages of the publication workflow. As Director Publishing Innovation, Dr. van Rossum is focused on testing and introducing important innovations with a focus on peer review. He holds a master's of science in biology from the University of Amsterdam, and a PhD in philosophy from VU University Amsterdam.
Ursula van Dijk has more than 20 years of experience in STM journal marketing. Currently, she leads a team of marketers who support publishing initiatives in the Physical, Formal and Applied Sciences area by communicating and interacting with researchers. Additionally, she is responsible for engaging with reviewers with a focus on initiatives that recognize their contributions to science. She holds a post graduate degree in journalism.
Ken Morison says: September 24, 2015 at 7:54 pm
OK, but the current system of having to bookmark an unrecognisable URL will not work for me as I use too many different computers. I’d expect a link from after any log into an Elsevier journal. And while I write this I am waiting for the system to generate the 2014 report. It failed! I’ll try again next year.
Darren Sugrue says: October 6, 2015 at 12:42 pm
Thank you very much for your feedback. Indeed bookmarking a page doesn’t seem to be the best option for someone switching from one web browser to the other all the time. The idea behind providing the encrypted hyperlink of your reviews profiles instead of putting it behind a sign-in wall is to make the page easily accessible without remembering any username/passwords.
Concerning report 2014, indeed there was a technical glitch on the system, which is fixed now and you should be able to download your report as a pdf file.
Philip Noble says: October 8, 2015 at 12:12 pm
I am missing something that I would like to understand. Reviewing manuscripts is one of the less rewarded tasks in my portfolio of activities- unlike writing grants, mentoring and publishing my own work. So,until reviewers are paid or promoted for their time and effort, why is there interest in one’s “reviewer history” and “review portfolio”? This just sounds like a way for the editors and staff of the publishing companies to get essential work done for free!!
Ju-Yong Kim says: October 9, 2015 at 2:42 am
Thank you for many information in this website.