Pregnant women could get on their bikes and stay healthy with better support
Research reveals obstacles to commuting by bicycle
Research reveals obstacles to commuting by bicycle
Medical advice from risk-averse health professionals may contribute to some women’s decisions to stop cycling to work during pregnancy, meaning they miss out on the potential benefits of the active commute. A recent study in the Journal of Transport & Health reveals the reasons why women decide to stop or continue cycling to work when they are pregnant, including often ambiguously worded or overly-cautious advice from medical guidelines, midwives and obstetricians.
More people than ever are commuting to work by bicycle in London. According to data from the 2011 census, the city saw a 144% increase in cycle-commuting over the previous decade. This has big health benefits, for the health of the individual cyclist as well as for public health more broadly, as it helps people move more as part of their everyday activities.
Moderate intensity exercise provides benefits during pregnancy for mother and baby. In the UK, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Health Service (NHS) both recommend pregnant women engage in daily exercise to help manage common discomforts, reduce pregnancy complications like preeclampsia, reduce discomfort and improve mood. But when it comes to cycling, the advice dries up: there are no clear recommendations women can use to decide whether to continue cycling.
“Despite the clear health benefits of cycling and the push to get more people commuting by bike, especially in cities like London, the medical advice on cycling during pregnancy remains murky,” commented Davara Lee Bennett, the author of the new study. “My research aimed to explore why women do – and don’t – cycle to work when they’re pregnant, with a view to supporting informed decision-making – including, if women so wish, rocking the rust off their chains, and bringing their bikes out from under the stairs and into the light.”
Bennett conducted three individual interviews and held three focus group discussions: with a group of women who had stopped cycling early, a group that had carried on into later pregnancy and a mixed group. She recorded and transcribed all of them, and analyzed the transcripts line-by-line to develop themes. The resulting factors that affected women’s decisions fell into a few main areas: physical obstacles and enablers, perceptions of risk and of pregnancy itself, and advice.
The idea of risk was a key factor in decisions about continued cycling: women adjusted their cycling practices to minimize risk, taking partners’ support or concern into account. Although some women had positive encounters with health professionals, the medical advice they received was often noncommittal or risk-averse.
During pregnancy, depending on women’s proportions and the type of bike, the growing belly can feel physically restrictive. Some women stopped cycling because of this, while others found comfort from their daily aches and pains when they commuted by bike. Either way, more comfortable bikes helped: women preferred Dutch-style, upright designs with a low crossbar and a wide, supportive seat.
Perceptions of pregnancy also had an impact on women’s decisions: some preferred to abandon their active commute, opting for a more peaceful state, while others continued to cycle in a bid to remain connected to their authentic selves.
“Understanding the obstacles to women’s cycling during pregnancy can support the development of safer cycling infrastructure and informed medical guidelines, ultimately offering more women the opportunity to benefit from an active commute,” said Bennett. “By addressing some of the more socially prohibitive public discourses on the topic, I hope that my research will not just enable informed decision-making by women, but also encourage more constructive support and advice for women from health professionals.”
Notes for editors
The article is "Bumps and bicycles: Women's experience of cycle-commuting during pregnancy," by Davara Lee Bennett (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.02.003). It appears in the Journal of Transport & Health, published by Elsevier.
Copies of this paper are available to credentialed journalists upon request; please contact Elsevier's Newsroom at email@example.com or +31 20 485 2492.
About Journal of Transport & Health
The Journal of Transport & Health is devoted to research on the many interactions between transport and health. These include the impacts on public health and inequalities of active modes of transport, road traffic injuries and community severance, road danger and its reduction, factors affecting transport choices and synergies between sustainability and health impacts of transport. The journal aims to cover transport and health issues in all countries.
Elsevier is a global information analytics business that helps institutions and professionals progress science, advance healthcare and improve performance for the benefit of humanity. Elsevier provides digital solutions and tools in the areas of strategic research management, R&D performance, clinical decision support, and professional education; including ScienceDirect, Scopus, ClinicalKey and Sherpath. Elsevier publishes over 2,500 digitized journals, including The Lancet and Cell, more than 35,000 e-book titles and many iconic reference works, including Gray's Anatomy. Elsevier is part of RELX Group, a global provider of information and analytics for professionals and business customers across industries. www.elsevier.com
+44 1865 843 806