New Whole Blood Assay May Help Overcome Roadblocks to TB Eradication

Assay accurately differentiates patients with latent TB from those with active disease, according to report in the Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

Philadelphia, PA, January 6, 2015

One of the roadblocks to the eradication of tuberculosis (TB) is the difficulty in identifying patients with latent TB infections (LTBI). Neither the tuberculin skin test (TST) nor interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are capable of distinguishing active from latent infection or predicting the chance of reactivation. A new multiple-target, real-time reverse transcription-PCR (real-time RT-PCR) TaqMan assay targeting eight human immune markers can differentiate active pulmonary TB from LTBI, according to a study in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.

"The World Health Organization reports that one third of the world's population is latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). It has been estimated that in 5% to 10% of LTBI individuals, the infection progresses to an active disease state, and the conversion rate is greater in immunosuppressed individuals such as those with HIV," explains Hyeyoung Lee, PhD, of the Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University (Republic of Korea). "Therefore, rapid diagnostic tests and effective treatment of LTBI are important to reduce and control the TB burden."

In previous work, the researchers quantified interferon-g (IFN-g) mRNA expression levels as an indicator of IFN-g levels in an IGRA test. However, the results of IFN-g RT-PCR showed poor specificity and sensitivity, and the test could not be used to distinguish between active and latent TB.

With these results in mind, the investigators developed a multiple-target RT-PCR TaqMan assay that could target eight human immune markers: Th1-type factors (IFN-g, TNF-a, and IL-2R), Th2-type cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10), and IFN-g-induced chemokines [CXCL9 (MIG), CXCL10 (IP-10), and CXCL11 (I-TAC)]. MTB-specific, antigen-dependent mRNA expression levels were measured in blood samples from 28 patients with active pulmonary TB, 22 with LTBI, and 29 non-TB controls.

When five of the human immune markers were evaluated individually, three were found to be suitable for detecting active pulmonary TB: TNF-a, IL-2R, and CXCL10, with sensitivities ranging from 96.43% to 100%. Two individual markers, IL-2R and CXCL10, were able to detect LTBI, with sensitivities of 86.36% and 81.82%, respectively.

To optimize sensitivity, Dr. Lee and her colleagues used the assay to simultaneously detect multiple targets. They found that the combination of TNF-a, IL-2R, CSCL9, and CSCL10 could differentiate active pulmonary TB from healthy controls (P <0.001) and LTBI from healthy controls (P <0.01). More importantly, the combination could differentiate those with active pulmonary TB from those with latent infection (P <0.01). The combination had a sensitivity of 100% for active disease and 81.82% for LTBI. "These results imply that a combination of suitable single markers is very useful for the efficient diagnosis and differentiation of MTB infection," says Dr. Lee.

In a commentary published in the same issue of The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, David H. Persing, MD, PhD, Executive Vice President and Chief Medical and Technology Officer of Cepheid, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, notes that the work by Dr. Lee and colleagues presents an interesting and potentially promising alternative approach to measure immune responses to MTB.

Dr. Persing underscores the healthcare threat resulting from the burden of future TB cases emerging from within the latent pool. He highlights some of the shortfalls of TST, mainly the risk of false-positive results in patients who have received the bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine and the need for skilled interpretation of the results in a follow-up visit. He cautions that IGRAs are also limited by their potential for false-positive and false-negative results, are technically challenging to perform reproducibly, and have less than ideal sensitivity, especially in those who are immunologically compromised.

"It is possible that one day a combination of selected antigen stimulation with multiplexed cytokine, chemokine, and interferon mRNA detection will lead to new ways of evaluating suspected TB patients for current and future disease risk," comments Dr. Persing. "With one third of the world's population at risk for recurrence, the investment in such technology is recommended."


Notes for editors
"Diagnostic Performance of a Cytokine and IFN-g–Induced Chemokine mRNA Assay after Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Antigen Stimulation in Whole Blood from Infected Individuals," by Sunghyun Kim, Hyejon Lee, Hyunjung Kim, Yeun Kim, Jang-Eun Cho, Hyunwoo Jin, Dae Yeon Kim, Sang-Jun Ha, Young Ae Kang, Sang-Nae Cho, and Hyeyoung Lee, DOI:

"Latent Tuberculosis: Interferon and Beyond?," by David H. Persing, MD, PhD, DOI:

Both appear in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, Volume 17, Issue 1 (January 2015) published by Elsevier.

Full text of this study and commentary is available to credentialed journalists upon request; contact Eileen Leahy at +1 732 238 3628 or Journalists wishing to interview the authors of the study should contact Sang-Nae Cho, DVM, PhD, at or Hyeyoung Lee, PhD, at +82 33 760 2740 or David H. Persing, MD, PhD, may be contacted at +1 408 400 8207 or

This research was supported by Korea Healthcare technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [grant HI10C1708 (A101750)], BK21 Plus Project, Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea (grant A121030), and the Yonsei University Research Fund of 2013.

About the Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
, (, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology, co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology, and published by Elsevier, Inc., seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods for diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.

The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, with an Impact Factor of 3.955, ranks 13th among 76 journals in Pathology, according to 2013 Journal Citation Reports® Thomson Reuters, 2014.

About Elsevier
Elsevier is a global information analytics business that helps scientists and clinicians to find new answers, reshape human knowledge, and tackle the most urgent human crises. For 140 years, we have partnered with the research world to curate and verify scientific knowledge. Today, we’re committed to bringing that rigor to a new generation of platforms. Elsevier provides digital solutions and tools in the areas of strategic research management, R&D performance, clinical decision support, and professional education; including ScienceDirect, Scopus, SciVal, ClinicalKey and Sherpath. Elsevier publishes over 2,500 digitized journals, including The Lancet and Cell, 39,000 e-book titles and many iconic reference works, including Gray's Anatomy. Elsevier is part of RELX, a global provider of information-based analytics and decision tools for professional and business customers.

Media contacts
Eileen Leahy
+1 732 238 3628
Dr. Chhavi Chauhan
Scientific Editor
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
+1 301 634 7953