Risk of Being Involved in an Avalanche Less for Smaller Groups of Recreationists

Groups of two or single individuals less likely to be caught in an avalanche than larger groups, according to a new report in Wilderness & Environmental Medicine

Philadelphia, PA, March 8, 2016

Avalanches are the primary hazard for winter backcountry recreationists and cause numerous deaths and injuries annually. As winter backcountry activities increase in popularity, avalanches are a very real risk for adventurers who choose to travel off the beaten path. A new study reported in Wilderness and Environmental Medicine explored the risk of avalanche accidents with respect to group size for the first time and found that travelling in groups of four or more people carried a higher relative avalanche risk than for individuals or groups of two.

Researchers compared winter backcountry usage data from Switzerland and Italy to accident data from the Swiss and Italian avalanche databases. Although the most common group size was two in both the usage and the accident datasets, larger groups had relatively more accidents. The highest risk was found for groups of six or more people in both the Swiss and Italian datasets For example, while groups of six or more people made up only 10% of all groups, they accounted for 23% of all accidents.

In additional to traditional data collection methods like field surveys and observations, investigators used a novel tactic to recover data: social media. “Social media are now frequently used by recreationists to report tours and travel conditions,” explained lead investigator Benjamin Zweifel, MSc, PhD, Avalanche Forecaster, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.

Avalanche

An example of in-field data collection: Registration board at Tschuggen in the Flüela Valley, Davos, Switzerland

This study confirms findings of earlier research that suggested large groups may pose a greater avalanche threat for a variety of reasons including higher load on the snow cover, increased probability to hit a weak spot in the snow cover, slower decision-making process of groups, challenges in communication, and high risk-appetite due to an increased but false sense of security. “Although the above risk factors may be obvious for large groups, these statements are also controversial,” stated Dr. Zweifel. “Group decision-making is a highly complex topic and there is no empirical evidence whether groups make better decisions than individuals or if group decision-making pitfalls prevail.”

The risks for groups seems clear, but the study also found that along with traveling in pairs, traveling alone also offered protection from avalanche risk.  However, researchers are quick to point out that solo backcountry exploration is dangerous for other reasons such as risk of injuries, fatigue, or getting lost. Dr. Zweifel commented: “Group factors are absent when someone travels alone in avalanche terrain, which may explain why we did not find higher risk for individuals. However, these results should be considered with caution and do not replace avalanche safety recommendations, which strongly deter recreationists from traveling alone.”

Actionable information is important so that enthusiasts can make the best decisions and stay safe. Avalanche safety considerations should start before a trip even begins and researchers hope that this report can help shed some light on how to better prepare for backcountry exploration. Going forward, people may consider traveling in smaller groups or implementing risk reduction measures to increase their chances of avoiding a deadly avalanche. Avalanche educators and tour guides can use this new data as a tool to make informed decisions and educate others about the possible risks.

“The risk of being involved in an avalanche and the associate mortality are high compared with other risks of backcountry recreation such as falls or hypothermia,” concluded Dr. Zweifel. “Group size and the related risk factors play a crucial role in avalanche risk management.”

---

Notes for editors
“Risk of Avalanche Involvement in Winter Backcountry Recreation: The Advantage of Small Groups,” by Benjamin Zweifel, MSc, PhD; Emily Procter, MSc; Frank Techel, MSc; Giacomo Strapazzon, MD, PhD; Roman Boutellier, Prof (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2015.12.001). It appears online in advance of Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, Volume 27, Issue 2 (June 2016) published by Elsevier.

Full text of this article is available to credentialed journalists upon request. Contact Theresa Monturano at +1 215 239 3711 or hmsmedia@elsevier.com to obtain copies. Journalists wishing to interview the authors should contact Benjamin Zweifel, MSc, PhD, at zweifel@slf.ch.

About Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine (WEM), the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is a peer-reviewed international journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. It is devoted to original scientific and technical contributions on the practice of medicine defined by isolation, extreme natural environments, and limited access to medical help and equipment. Sampling of topics covered: high altitude and climbing; hypothermia and cold-induced injuries; drowning and near-drowning; hazardous plants, reptiles, insects, and marine animals; animal attacks; search and rescue. www.wemjournal.org

About the Wilderness Medical Society
Founded in 1983, the Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) is the world's leading organization devoted to wilderness medical challenges. Wilderness medicine topics include expedition and disaster medicine, dive medicine, search and rescue, altitude illness, cold- and heat-related illness, wilderness trauma, and wild animal attacks. WMS explores health risks and safety issues in extreme situations such as mountains, jungles, deserts, caves, marine environments, and space. For more information on the WMS, or to become a member, please visit us at www.wms.org .

About Elsevier
Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solutions that enhance the performance of science, health, and technology professionals, empowering them to make better decisions, deliver better care, and sometimes make groundbreaking discoveries that advance the boundaries of knowledge and human progress. Elsevier provides web-based, digital solutions — among them ScienceDirect, Scopus, Research Intelligence and ClinicalKey— and publishes over 2,500 journals, including The Lancet and Cell, and more than 35,000 book titles, including a number of iconic reference works. Elsevier is part of RELX Group, a world-leading provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries. www.elsevier.com

Media contact
Theresa Monturano
Publisher
Elsevier
+1 215 239 3711
hmsmedia@elsevier.com