Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms More Likely to Suffer from Metabolic Syndrome According to New Study Published in The Journal of Urology
Important diagnostic and management implications for LUTS patients
New York, NY, June 18, 2009 – Researchers have determined that individuals with mild to severe symptoms of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are more likely to suffer from metabolic syndrome (MetS), a collection of cardiovascular risk factors thought to be linked by insulin resistance. LUTS encompass voiding (incomplete emptying, weak stream, intermittency, straining) and storage (frequency, urgency, nocturia) difficulties.
In a study published in the August 2009 issue of The Journal of Urology, researchers from the New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts; the Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Cornell University, Weill Medical College; Pfizer Inc, New York, New York; and Pfizer Ltd, Sandwich, United Kingdom, explored the possible association of LUTS with MetS using data from the Boston Area Community Health Survey. 2,301 men 30 to 79 years old were interviewed and analyses were conducted on 1,899 men who provided blood samples. Body measurements and blood pressure readings were done, and self-reported medical histories were taken.
The authors state, “These findings have important diagnostic and management implications. Patients who present with components of metabolic dysfunction should be routinely queried with respect to urological function, particularly voiding symptoms such as intermittency, incomplete emptying and nocturia, as well as the degree of associated bother. Sexual dysfunction symptoms, particularly erectile dysfunction, are similarly reported by the majority of men with MetS and should be routinely evaluated.”
LUTS were assessed using the American Urological Association symptom index (AUASI), a clinically validated measure of urological symptoms. The AUASI was categorized into two groups as none or mild symptoms (AUASI less than 8) versus moderate or severe symptoms (AUASI 8 or greater). In this analysis MetS was defined as the presence of three or more of the five characteristics of 1) waist circumference greater than 102 cm; 2) systolic blood pressure 130 mm Hg or greater or diastolic blood pressure 85 mm Hg or greater, or antihypertensive medication use; 3) HDL cholesterol less than 40 mg/dl or lipid medication use; 4) self-reported type 2 diabetes or increased blood sugar or diabetes medication use; 5) triglycerides greater than 150 mg/dl.
An increased odds ratio of 1.68 for metabolic syndrome was observed in men with mild to severe LUTS symptoms compared to those with few or no symptoms. A statistically significant association was observed between the metabolic syndrome and a voiding symptom score of 5 or greater (odds ratio 1.73), but not for a storage symptom score of 4 or greater (odds ratio 0.94). Increased odds of the metabolic syndrome were observed even with mild symptoms, primarily for incomplete emptying, intermittency and nocturia. These associations were observed primarily in younger men (younger than 60 years) and were null in older men (60 years or older).
In an Editorial Comment accompanying the article Dr. Brett A. Laven, Clinic of Urology, Milwaukee, states that “The findings presented become increasingly significant as society weighs the costs of delivering health care to a population with an increased incidence of obesity/MetS. It has been estimated that more than 1 billion people are currently overweight and the prevalence in children has considerably increased. The possibility of pharmaceutically targeting the adipokine system, thus influencing a neuroendocrine pathway that might impact LUTS, is intriguing.”
The article is “Association of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and the Metabolic Syndrome. Results From the Boston Area Community Health Survey” by Varant Kupelian, Kevin T. McVary, Steven A. Kaplan, Susan A. Hall, Carol L. Link, Lalitha Padmanabhan Aiyer, Patrick Mollon, Nihad Tamimi, Raymond C. Rosen and John B. McKinlay. It appears in The Journal of Urology, Volume 182, Issue 2 (August 2009) published by Elsevier.
# # #
Full text of the article featured above is available upon request. Contact Linda Gruner at 212-633-3923 or email@example.com to obtain a copy. To schedule an interview with Varant Kupelian, New England Research Institutes, please call 617-923-7747 ext 293 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
ABOUT THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY®
Established in 1917, The Journal of Urology is the official journal of the American Urological Association. It is the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field. It brings to its readership all the clinically relevant information needed to stay at the forefront of this dynamic field. This top-ranking journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide and practice-oriented reports on interesting clinical observations.
Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solutions that enhance the performance of science, health, and technology professionals, empowering them to make better decisions, deliver better care, and sometimes make groundbreaking discoveries that advance the boundaries of knowledge and human progress. Elsevier provides web-based, digital solutions — among them ScienceDirect, Scopus, Research Intelligence and ClinicalKey— and publishes over 2,500 journals, including The Lancet and Cell, and more than 35,000 book titles, including a number of iconic reference works. Elsevier is part of RELX Group, a world-leading provider of information and analytics for professional and business customers across industries. www.elsevier.com
+1 212 633 3923