Systemic biases in science hinder diversity and inclusion
Nabila Ismail, Research Scientist at Stellenbosch University, highlights the need for greater representation of Global South communities and women in scientific discussions and events.
Systemic biases in science hinder diversity and inclusion
Key points:
Logistical barriers: Female scientists face challenges in participating due to geographic and logistical constraints
Bias in selection: Past criteria favored male scientists from the Global North, but diversity-focused changes are emerging
The bottom line: Prioritizing diversity in science enriches the field and ensures broader representation.
Confidence in Research: Nabila Ismail — Systemic biases in science hinder diversity and inclusion
Watch now
|
Confidence in Research: Nabila Ismail — Systemic biases in science hinder diversity and inclusion
Video transcript
"Take, for example, the opening speech where it was made mention that two female scientists and two male scientists would have been suitable for a panel, but the two female scientists were across the Atlantic and the two male scientists were a train ride away. Diversity versus climate protection was not a choice the organizers wanted to make. The speech went on to mention how scores for previous years or abstracts for presentations were based on scientific excellence, which allowed for a preponderance of male scientists from the Global North. Whereas this year, the year that I presented, they ensured diversity by basing the scores on scientific interest."
[Transcript generated by AI with human review]