Position statements
Elsevier is actively involved in discussing the key issues on a range of important issues related to scholarly publishing, including open access, open data and open science. We are committed to making our written submissions and evidence open and transparent for everyone to read.
Open Access
- Elsevier response to the Swedish Research Council's draft national guidelines (PDF)
- Response to Independent Review of RCUK policy (PDF)
- Elsevier response to the draft open access policy - DBT/DST (PDF)
- Consultation on the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy (PDF)
- Consultation on the Post - 2014 Research Excellence Framework (PDF)
- Elsevier Response to HEFCE Open Access Policy (PDF)
- Response to STC Inquiry on Peer Review (PDF)
- OSTP Data Response (PDF)
- OSTP Publications Response (PDF)
- Reed Elsevier submission to House of Lords Science and Technology Committee inquiry on OA policy implementation (PDF)
- Reed Elsevier submission to House of Commons BIS Select Committee inquiry on Government Open Access policy (PDF)
- Elsevier response to the Finch Report
Research Data and Metrics
- Elsevier response to Concordat on Open Research Data (PDF)
- NIH Request for Information (RFI): Metrics to Assess Value of Biomedical Digital Repositories (PDF)
- NIH Request for Information (RFI): Input on Sustaining Biomedical Data Repositories (PDF)
- NIH Request for Information (RFI): Input on National Cancer Institute Metadata Repository and Services (PDF)
- Elsevier’s Response to Request for Information: Input on NIAID Data Sharing Repository, Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), and Services Part 1 and Part 2