跳到主要內容

很遺憾,我們無法支援你的瀏覽器。如果可以,請升級到新版本,或使用 Mozilla Firefox、Microsoft Edge、Google Chrome 或 Safari 14 或更新版本。如果無法升級,而且需要支援,請將你的回饋寄給我們。

我們衷心感謝你對這個新體驗的回饋。告訴我們你的想法(打開新的分頁/視窗)

Elsevier
與我們共同出版

Diversity, equity and inclusion in publishing at Elsevier: an editor guide

Processes & tools

We innovate our processes, workflows and tools to support DEI throughout the publishing process.

Avoiding publication bias

Initiatives such as Registered Reports and Results Masked Review aim for work to be judged on the merits of the research question and methodology, not the findings.

Registered Reports requires authors to submit and commit to their protocols before experiments are conducted. The journal then accepts the paper in principle, based on whether editors believe the protocol has merit, and commits to publishing the research regardless of the results.

iDboard-image

With Results Masked Review, the experiments have already taken place, but the reviewers are first sent the paper with the results masked.

Both models seek to prevent publication bias and enhance transparency, thereby ensuring that results aren't skewed in pursuit of publication.

Inclusion peer review

Using diverse sources to identify suitable reviewers helps to diversify the candidates who are invited to review or join journal's reviewer communities. In support of this, we provide you with a selection of tools(打開新的分頁/視窗), including Elsevier's "Find Reviewers using Scopus"(打開新的分頁/視窗) in Editorial Manager.

Best practice

We strive to raise awareness and understanding, and encourage adoption of best practice (including through policies), in pursuit of DEI.

Self-reporting diversity data in Editorial Manager

We pursue an evidence-based approach to advancing DEI. In line with this, we are inviting editors, reviewers and authors to optionally self-report their diversity data in Editorial Manager (EM). The gender identity, race and ethnicity (GRE) schemas used as part of this are those developed collaboratively across publishers(打開新的分頁/視窗), led by Elsevier's Dr. Holly Falk-Krzesinski, and endorsed in April this year(打開新的分頁/視窗). The self-reported data will enable us to put in place actions, set goals and measure progress to improve diversity across journal editorial processes and drive greater equity in publishing and research more broadly.

view-workforce-data

Editorial team diversity

In 2016, we began engaging editors on the importance of gender-balanced editorial teams and we continue this dialogue today, for example, evaluating how we support women researchers to advance into editorial roles and seeking to learn what more we can do.

We work closely with our editors to support our journals in being transparent about editorial team diversity and accountable to our communities about ambitions to further DEI. All Elsevier journals display the geographical breakdown of Editorial Boards on their journal homepages, and over 1,000 titles display self-reported data on their handling editor's gender identities, with a further expansion to full editorial teams planned. Over half of Elsevier journals have published pledges on their journal homepages committing to improve diversity in their editorial teams with defined objectives.

 Gender diversity and country distribution of the editors of an Elsevier neuroscience journal

Gender diversity and country distribution of the editors.

Training and guidance in your role

As an editor, together with society partners and publishers, you play a crucial role in advancing DEI in the journal and community you serve. Our Editor Essentials module on inclusion and diversity(打開新的分頁/視窗) provides you with practical actions to advance inclusion and diversity among your journal’s Editorial Board, reviewers and authors.

Additionally, we took a deep-dive into inclusive peer review in September 2021, publishing a four-part article series covering the importance of inclusive peer review and best practice for you to adopt: The case for (more) diversity in peer reviewPeer review diversity in actionHow to improve reviewer diversity: a toolkit for editors (part I)How to improve reviewer diversity: a toolkit for editors (part II).

Please continue to refer to Editor Essentials(打開新的分頁/視窗) on Elsevier Researcher Academy for the latest information and insights to support you.

Training and guidance for other roles

We work to provide new and aspiring reviewers with a thorough grounding in the principles and practice of refereeing via our certified peer reviewer course(打開新的分頁/視窗) (a Chinese language version is also available). From here they are signposted to the Reviewer Hub where they can volunteer to review(打開新的分頁/視窗) for relevant journals. This plays an important role in making reviewing more inclusive.

Similarly, we continuously review and enhance guidance to provide authors with the most up-to-date advice on how to promote inclusion and diversity in their research and publication practices. Our Researcher Academy inclusion and diversity modules(打開新的分頁/視窗) and journals’ guides for authors are key sources of information. Our guides for authors advise on the use of inclusive language, discussed further in this Authors’ Update article on using language to empower. We are currently working on introducing a section on the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines(打開新的分頁/視窗), which recognize the importance of sex and gender within the research itself, a dimension of analysis that has a critical impact on research quality and outcomes.

Avoiding unconscious bias

Several organizations(打開新的分頁/視窗) and groups(打開新的分頁/視窗)Elsevier among them(打開新的分頁/視窗), are making conscious efforts to tackle unconscious bias which, if left unchecked, can risk negatively impacting the publication of good research. This has led to the creation of a number of resources which can be employed to identify and combat unconscious bias or to reduce the likelihood of it affecting the peer review and academic publishing process, summarized in this article exploring unconscious bias, and on our dedicated unconscious bias page.

Inclusive name change policy

Elsevier’s trans-inclusive policy for author name changes allows transgender authors, and other authors who need to change their name privately, e.g., for reasons of personal safety, to update their name on previously published papers invisibly, i.e., with a resupply and no erratum / corrigendum. This policy, which is aligned with industry best practice(打開新的分頁/視窗), enables us to help protect authors’ privacy and safety, while still safeguarding the scholarly record.

Your first step

I want to get involved, where should I start?

If you do one thing today, make it this: If you have not already done so, please view our Researcher Academy inclusion and diversity modules(打開新的分頁/視窗) and with the insights gained and ideas sparked, work with your collaborators and co-authors to discuss how to advance DEI in your research and writing practice.