立場聲明

Elsevier 積極參與討論與學術出版相關的一系列重要問題，包括公開取用、資料開放和開放科學。我們承諾將自己的書面意見和聲明公開透明，供所有人閱讀。

公開取用

• ●

  Publisher statement on the Rights Retention Strategy (打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier summary response to UKRI Open Access Review Consultation(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier response to UKRI Open Access Review Consultation(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier response to OSTP Request for Information on Public Access(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Dutch research institutions and Elsevier reach framework agreement

• ●

  National license agreement sees Elsevier support France’s open science objectives

• ●

  About the resignation of the Journal of Informetrics Editorial Board

• ●

  Elsevier is committed to reaching national agreement with Project Deal

• ●

  Elsevier serves the global research community to deliver open science

• ●

  Elsevier response to the Swedish Research Council's draft national guidelines(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Response to Independent Review of RCUK policy(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier response to the draft open access policy - DBT/DST(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Consultation on the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Consultation on the Post-2014 Research Excellence Framework(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier response to HEFCE Open Access Policy(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Response to STC Inquiry on Peer Review(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  OSTP Data Response(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  OSTP Publications Response(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Reed Elsevier submission to House of Lords Science and Technology Committee inquiry on OA policy implementation(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Reed Elsevier submission to House of Commons BIS Select Committee inquiry on Government Open Access policy(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier response to the Finch Report(打開新的分頁／視窗)

研究資料和指標

• ●

  Elsevier endorses Leiden Manifesto to guide its development of improved research evaluation

• ●

  Elsevier endorses the Sorbonne declaration on research data rights(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier endorses the European Open Science Cloud Declaration(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier response to Concordat on Open Research Data(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  NIH Request for Information (RFI): Metrics to Assess Value of Biomedical Digital Repositories(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  NIH Request for Information (RFI): Input on Sustaining Biomedical Data Repositories(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  NIH Request for Information (RFI): Input on National Cancer Institute Metadata Repository and Services(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Elsevier’s Response to Request for Information: Input on NIAID Data Sharing Repository, Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), and Services Part 1(打開新的分頁／視窗) and Part 2(打開新的分頁／視窗)

其他聲明

• ●

  Open letter in response to the request for Elsevier to withdraw its Text and Data Mining policy(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  Request for Information (RFI): Soliciting Input for the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Strategic Planning Process(打開新的分頁／視窗)

• ●

  支援圖書館經費

  • ●

    Letter to the Subcommittee on Labor, Health & Human Services, and Education, House Appropriations Committee(打開新的分頁／視窗)

  • ●

    Letter to the Subcommittee on Labor, Health & Human Services, and Education, Senate Appropriations Committee(打開新的分頁／視窗)