주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

귀하의 브라우저가 완벽하게 지원되지 않습니다. 옵션이 있는 경우 최신 버전으로 업그레이드하거나 Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome 또는 Safari 14 이상을 사용하세요. 가능하지 않거나 지원이 필요한 경우 피드백을 보내주세요.

이 새로운 경험에 대한 귀하의 의견에 감사드립니다.의견을 말씀해 주세요새 탭/창에서 열기

Elsevier
엘스비어와 함께 출판
Press release

Emotional Pain, Not Fear, Weighs More Heavily on Individuals with PTSD

2026년 2월 4일

A study in Biological Psychiatry identifies two distinct biological post-traumatic stress disorder profiles, paving the way for more precise and compassionate treatment

New research is challenging the long-held view of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a fear-based disorder. In a new study, 68% of trauma-exposed individuals reported that emotional pain (guilt, shame, sadness, loss of joy) impaired their daily functioning more than fear. The findings from this researchopens in new tab/window in Biological Psychiatryopens in new tab/window, published by Elsevier, underscore the need to broaden PTSD models beyond fear and re-evaluate treatment pathways accordingly.

PTSD affects approximately 8% of individuals and often co-occurs with depression and anxiety. The DSM-5 defines PTSD based on 20 symptoms spanning intrusion, avoidance, negative mood and cognition, and hyper-arousal. In this study across two independent samples, researchers identified two distinct PTSD profiles—one centered on fear (flashbacks and hyper-arousal symptoms), and another on emotional pain (symptoms of guilt, shame, anhedonia).

“For some, trauma inflicts not just fear, but a moral or existential wound, shattering beliefs about oneself, others, or the world; For others, it deepens pre-existing negative schemas, reinforcing guilt, shame, or worthlessness. These internalized and meaning-laden responses often give rise to persistent emotional pain,” says first author Ziv Ben-Zion, PhD, Yale School of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, and University of Haifa.

Senior investigator Ilan Harpaz-Rotem, PhD, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, adds, “Basic science, including the research done in our lab at Yale, has focused for years on fear learning and safety updating, with minimal attention to the toll of other negative emotions associated with PTSD. We started thinking that fear and emotional pain are potentially driven by two different biological systems that play a critical role in defining how to tailor pharmacological and psychological treatments for PTSD.”

The research was conducted in two phases. In Study 1, using a large online sample of 838 trauma-exposed individuals, researchers mapped how fear and emotional pain relate to specific PTSD symptoms through network analysis. Study 2, a unique longitudinal neuroimaging study of 162 recent trauma survivors, used whole-brain connectivity at one-month post-trauma to predict symptom severity 14 months later for the two profiles identified in Study 1 (Fear and Emotional Pain). Connectivity patterns robustly predicted chronic fear-based symptoms but not emotional pain, suggesting mechanistic differences between these profiles.

This is one of the first studies to integrate subjective emotional experience, symptom network structure, and neurobiological prediction to differentiate PTSD profiles.

John Krystal, MD, Editor of Biological Psychiatry, comments, “One of the most challenging aspects of mental health care is simply and accurately characterizing the actual emotional symptoms associated with psychiatric disorders. People may use different words to describe the same experience, and they may apply the same descriptor to different experiences. Neuroimaging may provide a strategy to help to untangle this state of affairs.”

Dr. Krystal continues, “This study identifies distinct emotional symptoms that are associated with PTSD: fear and emotional pain. These two experiences are represented by different circuits in the brain, and they are differentially associated with other PTSD symptoms. Fear was associated with increased arousal, nightmares, and intrusive trauma memories, while emotional pain was associated with depression-like symptoms and insomnia.”

“Rather than proposing a new diagnostic category, our goal is to sharpen the clinical understanding of PTSD by identifying the emotional lens of fear or emotional pain through which trauma is most acutely experienced,” notes Dr. Harpaz-Rotem.

Identifying whether a patient’s distress is primarily driven by fear or by emotional pain could guide more personalized and mechanism-based treatment planning. Fear-driven profiles may respond best to exposure-based therapies, whereas emotional pain may be better addressed through approaches targeting guilt, shame, and negative self-beliefs. This distinction may also help clarify which symptoms are likely to persist chronically.

Dr. Ben-Zion concludes, “PTSD is not a single emotional experience. Our goal was to bring the patient’s subjective emotional reality to the center of the scientific discussion. Recognizing which emotional system is driving a person’s distress can open the door to more precise and compassionate treatment.”

Notes for editors

The article is "Dissecting Fear and Emotional Pain in PTSD: From Symptom Networks to Neural Signatures,” by Ziv Ben-Zion, Erin Z. Basol, Alexander J. Simon, Maayan Abargil, Katherine Samonek, Megan Patterson, Tobias R. Spiller, Or Duek, Stefan Just, Katrin Preller, Jakcob N. Keynan, Roee Admon, Israel Liberzon, Arieh Y. Shalev, Talma Hendler, Ifat Levy, Jutta Joormann, Dustin Scheinost, and Ilan Harpaz-Rotem (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.11.016opens in new tab/window). It is published online in Biological Psychiatry, published by Elsevier.

The article is openly available for 60 days at https://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/S0006-3223(25)01645-2/fulltextopens in new tab/window.

Copies of the full text and additional information are also available to credentialed journalists upon request; please contact Rhiannon Bugno at [email protected]opens in new tab/window. Journalists wishing to interview the authors should contact Ziv Ben-Zion, PhD, at [email protected]opens in new tab/window or [email protected]opens in new tab/window.

This research was supported by an Investigator Imitated Research (IIR) Precision Psychiatry grant from Boehringer Ingelheim (Study 1) and by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, Study 2, award number R01-MH103287).

The authors’ affiliations and disclosures of financial relationships and conflicts of interests are available in the article.

John H. Krystal, MD, is Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine, Chief of Psychiatry at Yale-New Haven Hospital, and a research psychiatrist at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System. His disclosures of financial relationships and conflicts of interests are available hereopens in new tab/window.

About Biological Psychiatry

Biological Psychiatryopens in new tab/window is the official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatryopens in new tab/window, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal publishes both basic and clinical contributions from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and treatment of major psychiatric disorders.

The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field, particularly those addressing genetic and environmental risk factors, neural circuitry and neurochemistry, and important new therapeutic approaches. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.

Biological Psychiatry is one of the most selective and highly cited journals in the field of psychiatric neuroscience. It is ranked 9th out of 156 Psychiatry titles and 17th out of 271 Neurosciences titles in Journal Citation ReportsTM, published by Clarivate. The 2024 Impact Factor score for Biological Psychiatry is 9.0.www.sobp.org/journalopens in new tab/window

엘스비어 소개

엘스비어는 첨단 정보와 의사결정 지원 분야의 글로벌 선도 기업으로 100년 넘게 과학과 헬스케어의 발전을 지원하며 인류 진보에 기여해 왔습니다. 우리는 170개국 이상에서 학술 및 기업 연구 커뮤니티, 의사, 간호사, 미래의 의료 전문가와 교육자들을 지원합니다. 근거에 기반한 신뢰할 수 있는 과학·의학 콘텐츠와 최첨단 AI 기술을 결합해 중요한 통찰과 혁신적인 솔루션을 제공해, 의미있는 성과를 이루도록 돕고 있습니다. 또한 다양성과 지속 가능성을 제품과 기업 문화 전반에 내재화하며, 우리가 속한 커뮤니티와 협력합니다. 엘스비어 재단opens in new tab/window은 전 세계에서 연구와 보건 파트너십을 지원합니다.

엘스비어는 전문가 및 기업 고객에게 정보 기반의 분석과 의사결정 도구를 제공하는 글로벌 기업 RELXopens in new tab/window의 일원입니다. 자세한 내용은 www.elsevier.com에서 확인할 수 있으며, 소셜미디어 @elsevierconnect를 통해 최신 소식을 받아보실 수 있습니다.

연락처

RB

Rhiannon Bugno

Editorial Office

Biological Psychiatry

Rhiannon Bugno 이메일