跳到主要內容

很遺憾,我們無法支援你的瀏覽器。如果可以,請升級到新版本,或使用 Mozilla Firefox、Microsoft Edge、Google Chrome 或 Safari 14 或更新版本。如果無法升級,而且需要支援,請將你的回饋寄給我們。

我們衷心感謝你對這個新體驗的回饋。告訴我們你的想法

Elsevier
與我們共同出版
Press release

Not All "Forever Chemicals" Are Equal: Experts Call for Nuanced PFAS Policy to Protect Human and Public Health and the Environment

2025年7月14日

Articles in Heart Rhythm highlight the urgent need to distinguish between harmful PFAS and essential fluoropolymers used in medical technology

The public, legislators, and media often group per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS or “forever chemicals,” which are found globally in countless products, into a single category. While certain PFAS are harmful for human and public health, new articles in Heart Rhythm, the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, and the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society, published by Elsevier, emphasize that fluoropolymers, a specific class of PFAS, are not considered environmental contaminants and are indispensable for use in medical devices. Experts call for a balanced approach to protect both the environment and availability of essential medical technologies.

PFAS are found in a constellation of products across all sectors of commerce and all parts of the globe. These industries include textiles, aerospace, communications, electronics, pharmaceuticals, energy, and healthcare.

In their article “The role of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in medical devices and delivery systems: Why the electrophysiologist should care,” Heart Rhythm Society member and clinician from the Minneapolis Heart Institute Pierce J. Vatterott, MD, and biomaterial scientists Paul D. Drumheller, PhD, Nadine Ding, PhD, and Joyce Wong, PhD, explain, “Due to their high chemical stability, PFAS are persistent in the environment and certain PFAS have been linked to water contamination, environmental effects, and human disease. Two noteworthy substances are the water-soluble, small-molecule compounds perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). These two compounds are considered environmental contaminants by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).”

PFAS encompass over 12,000 compounds besides PFOA and PFOS and fall into distinct classes that have vastly different chemical, biological, and toxicological properties. One specific class of PFAS – fluoropolymers – are essential to human and public health, especially to cardiac electrophysiology. According to the US Food and Drug Administration, approximately 250,000 approved medical devices contain fluoropolymers. These fluoropolymers undergo extensive biocompatibility and pre-clinical testing and have not been linked to health issues associated with their long-term use. Fluoropolymers are significantly larger than water-soluble PFAS and are not considered environmental contaminants by the EPA.

Fluoropolymers are critical in all phases of medical device use (e.g., cardiac implantable electronic devices, ablation catheters and sheaths), including their manufacturing process, performance, and delivery within the human body.

Noted expert Roger Carrillo, MD, MBA, FHRS, Chief of Surgical Electrophysiology at Palmetto General Hospital, Miami, emphasizes: “Fluoropolymers play a crucial role in thousands of modern medical devices. Their unique properties have enabled the miniaturization of valves, created slippery surfaces for catheters, and provided the flexibility and electrical insulation essential for components of leads and cardiac pacemakers. Unlike smaller PFAS molecules linked to health concerns and water contamination, these large polymers have not been associated with such issues. It is imperative that clinicians understand the important differences within this diverse class of compounds. Dr. Vatterott et al.’s contribution in Heart Rhythm provides a concise, detailed, and informative insight into this topic.”

The authors point out, "At present, no other class of materials exists with fluoropolymers’ unique combined properties including lubricity, biostability, temperature tolerance, strength, flexibility, and electrical insulation. For over 50 years, they have been safely used in medical devices such as brain shunts, cardiac valves, catheters, vascular grafts, pacemakers, and defibrillator systems. Fluoropolymers enable minimally invasive procedures, improve long-term device function, reliability, and allow significant advancements including device miniaturization."

In the accompanying article “PFAS regulations and the potential impacts on patient care,” the authors highlight key proposed and enacted bans and restrictions, particularly in the US at the federal and state levels, Canada, and the European Union. “Many legislations seek to regulate these over 12,000 distinct chemicals as a single class, motivated by the known risks of specific water-soluble, small-molecule compounds, i.e., they do not distinguish between toxic water-soluble small-molecule PFAS and medical fluoropolymers. These efforts are threatening the availability of fluoropolymers even in cases where medical device exclusions are allowed,” notes lead author Paul D. Drumheller, PhD, American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, Washington, DC.

The authors of the accompanying editorial "What every electrophysiologist should know and worry about," Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FHRS, Medical College of Virginia / VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, and Charles D. Swerdlow MD, FHRS, Smidth Heart Institute at Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, say, “Because small-molecule PFAS are toxic, PFAS are increasingly being regulated worldwide; and much legislation does not distinguish between small, toxic molecules and medical fluoropolymers. PFAS manufacturers are not waiting for these regulations to take effect. They are exiting the medical fluoropolymer market, threatening the supply chain for all medical products that use fluoropolymers. Thus, these proposed and enacted regulations have important implications for clinical electrophysiologists worldwide. The articles in Heart Rhythm help us better understand the complex issues surrounding PFAS and medical fluoropolymers.”

Dr. Vatterott concludes, “Loss of access to fluoropolymers will have profound negative effects for our patients and on the practice of medicine, especially cardiac electrophysiology. It is critical to find a path that protects our environment but ensures the availability of fluoropolymers that are essential in medical devices, minimally invasive procedures, and drives ongoing innovation in medical technology.”

Notes for editors

The articles are:

“The role of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in medical devices and delivery systems: Why the electrophysiologist should care,” by Pierce J. Vatterott, MD, FACC, Paul D. Drumheller, PhD, Nadine Ding, PhD, and Joyce Y. Wong, PhD (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.057). It is openly available for 60 days at https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(25)02518-4/fulltext.

“PFAS regulations and the potential impacts on patient care,” by Paul D. Drumheller, PhD, Nadine Ding, PhD, Joyce Y. Wong, PhD, Dawn Beraud, PhD, and Pierce J. Vatterott, MD, FACC, (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.058). It is openly available for 60 days at https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(25)02519-6/fulltext.

Journalists wishing to speak to the authors should contact Pierce J. Vatterott, MD, FACC, at [email protected].

The editorial commentary is "What every electrophysiologist should know and worry about," by Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FHRS, and Charles D. Swerdlow MD, FHRS, (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.06.021). It is openly available for 60 days at https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(25)02600-1/fulltext.

Journalists wishing to speak to the authors should contact Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, MD, FHRS, at [email protected].

The articles appear online in advance of Heart Rhythm, volume 22, issue 9 (September 2025), published by Elsevier.

Full text of the articles is also available to credentialed journalists upon request; contact Jane Grochowski at +1 406 542 8397 or [email protected].

About Heart Rhythm

Heart Rhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society, the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, and the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. It integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. www.heartrhythmjournal.com

About the Heart Rhythm Society

The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal healthcare policies and standards. Incorporated in 1979 and based in Washington, D.C., HRS has a membership of more than 9,600 heart rhythm professionals from 94 countries. www.HRsonline.org

關於 Elsevier

身為科學資訊與分析的全球領導者,Elsevier 協助研究人員與醫療照護專業人員推動科學發展,改善醫療成果,造福社會。我們以可信賴、以實證為基礎的內容和先進的 AI 數位技術為基礎,透過創新的解決方案促進洞察力和關鍵決策。

140 多年來,我們一直為研究和醫療保健界的工作提供支援。我們全球 9,500 名員工,包括 2,300 名技術人員,致力於支援研究人員、圖書館館長、學術領袖、資金提供者、政府、研發密集型公司、醫生、護士、未來醫療保健專業人員和教育工作者的重要工作。我們的 2,900 種科學期刊和經典參考工具書包括其領域中最重要的書籍,包括 Cell Press、The Lancet 和 Gray's Anatomy。 我們與愛思唯爾基金會 (Elsevier Foundation) 合作,與我們服務的社群攜手合作,在發展中國家和世界各地的科學、研究和醫療保健領域推動包容性和多樣性。 Elsevier 是 RELX 的一部分,RELX 是一家為專業和商業客戶提供以資訊為基礎的分析和決策工具的全球供應商。有關我們的工作、數位解決方案和內容的更多資訊,請造訪 www.elsevier.com

聯絡人

JG

Jane Grochowski

Publisher

Elsevier

+1 406 542 8397

電子郵件 Jane Grochowski