Inconsistent uptake of US federal child and adult care food program means children lack access to nutritious food

Current participation rates in the US federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) by licensed child care centers point to program underutilization and unequal access, according to the first nationwide analysis 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く of data on CACFP participation in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く, published by Elsevier.

Lead investigator Tatiana Andreyeva, PhD, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health, University of Connecticut, explained, “Unfortunately, CACFP is underutilized and underappreciated. Despite offering robust program benefits, including better nutrition for children, help for families, food cost reimbursement for child care providers, and the local infusion of federal dollars, our study found that participation – averaging only 36.5% across all licensed centers and 57.5% in low-income areas – lags behind other federal nutrition assistance programs and is unequal across states.”

Participation rates across states varied from 15.2% to 65.3% in the full study sample, and from 15.7% to 85.7% in low-income areas. Higher-income areas had an average participation rate of 31.8%. Similarly, there were differences in CACFP participation rates across USDA regions, with the highest rates observed in the Southeast and lowest in the West and Mountain Plains regions.

CACFP is one of the 15 federal nutrition assistance programs intended to reduce food insecurity and improve nutrition. It provides reimbursements for meals and snacks served to participating child care centers, family daycare homes, emergency shelters, after-school programs, and adult daycare centers, reaching 4.58 million individuals in fiscal year (FY) 2022. The investigators point out that CACFP reaches children at the most critical age, from 0-5 years, for sowing maximal economic and social returns.

Data were collected from the state agencies that oversee licensing and CACFP and merged with data that included sociodemographics to assess household income in communities where centers were located. CACFP-eligible child care centers were identified based on their location in low-income areas. Three states did not provide adequate data and were excluded (Alabama, Montana, and North Carolina).

The study identified contributing factors for CACFP’s inconsistent uptake. While some states are successful in getting providers to join the program, the investigators found surprisingly large variation.

Dr. Andreyeva said, “States have power to increase access to the program that would help so many young children and their care providers. Understanding factors shaping the decisions of child care centers to provide meals and participate in CACFP should be a priority for the USDA, state agencies, and advocates seeking to improve child nutrition and food security.”

The recommendations include encouraging states to regularly assess/track participation among eligible providers and emphasize program outreach. In addition, federal policymakers can and should play a much larger role in expanding access to CACFP. At the federal level, CACFP does not appear to receive the attention and funding that other nutrition assistance programs do.

Co-investigator Erica L. Kenney, ScD, Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, elaborated, “CACFP has potential to help feed so many young kids, but we see evidence that the program is not being used consistently. We want to acknowledge the states that do a phenomenal job in getting providers to join the program and feed kids.”

---

Notes for editors

The article is“Federal Nutrition Assistance for Young Children: Underutilized and Unequally Accessed,” byTatiana Andreyeva, PhD, Timothy E. Moore, PhD, Lucas da Cunha Godoy, MSc, and Erica L. Kenney, ScD(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.008 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く). It appears online in advance of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, volume 66, issue 1(January 2024), published by Elsevier.

The article is openly available at https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(23)00354-9/fulltext 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く.

Research reported in this study was supported by Healthy Eating Research, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (https://healthyeatingresearch.org 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く).

Full text of this article is also available to credentialed journalists upon request; contact Jillian B. Morgan at +1 734 936 1590 or [email protected] 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く. Journalists wishing to interview the authors should contact Carson Hardee, Director of Communications, Rudd Center for Food Policy & Health, at [email protected] 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く.

About the American Journal of Preventive Medicine

The American Journal of Preventive Medicine 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. The journal features papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women's health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and alcohol and drug abuse. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, health services research pertinent to prevention and public health, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. www.ajpmonline.org 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く

エルゼビアについて

エルゼビアは情報分析を専門としたグローバル企業として、研究者や医療専門家の方々を支援し、社会にとっての利益最大化に向けて、科学や医療の進展を支えています。これは、信頼できるエビデンスによるコンテンツと高度なAI対応によるデジタル技術に基づく革新的なソリューションにより、知見の集積や重要な意思決定を支援することで実現されています。

エルゼビアは、全世界で9,700人の従業員（うち技術者2,300人以上）を抱え、140年以上にわたって、研究者、図書館員、アカデミックリーダー、資金提供者、政府、研究開発集約型企業、医師、看護師、将来の医療専門家、教育者など研究・医療分野におけるパートナーの重要な活動を支援してきました。エルゼビアが刊行する3,000誌以上の科学ジャーナルと代表的な参考書には、The Lancet 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開く、Cell Press 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開くおよびGray’s Anatomyなどをはじめとする、各分野を代表する主要なタイトルが含まれています。 エルゼビア・ファンデーション 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開くとの活動を通し、私たちがサービスを提供する地域社会と連携して、開発途上国を含む世界中の医学、研究、医療分野における、インクルージョン＆ダイバーシティ（I&D）の改善に努めています。

エルゼビアは、専門家および企業向けの情報分析および意思決定ツールのグローバルプロバイダーであるRELX Group 新しいタブ／ウィンドウで開くの一事業を担っています。エルゼビアの事業内容、デジタルソリューション、コンテンツなどの詳細については、www.elsevier.comをご覧ください。