입장문

엘스비어는 오픈 액세스, 오픈 데이터 및 오픈 사이언스를 포함하여 학술 출판과 관련된 다양한 중요 문제에 대한 주요 문제를 논의하는 데 적극적으로 참여하고 있습니다. 엘스비어는 서면 제출문 및 선언문을 모든 사람이 읽을 수 있도록 공개하고 투명하게 만들기 위해 최선을 다하고 있습니다.

오픈 액세스

• ●

  Publisher statement on the Rights Retention Strategy (새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier summary response to UKRI Open Access Review Consultation(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier response to UKRI Open Access Review Consultation(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier response to OSTP Request for Information on Public Access(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Dutch research institutions and Elsevier reach framework agreement

• ●

  National license agreement sees Elsevier support France’s open science objectives

• ●

  About the resignation of the Journal of Informetrics Editorial Board

• ●

  Elsevier is committed to reaching national agreement with Project Deal

• ●

  Elsevier serves the global research community to deliver open science

• ●

  Elsevier response to the Swedish Research Council's draft national guidelines(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Response to Independent Review of RCUK policy(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier response to the draft open access policy - DBT/DST(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Consultation on the Tri-Agency Open Access Policy(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Consultation on the Post-2014 Research Excellence Framework(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier response to HEFCE Open Access Policy(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Response to STC Inquiry on Peer Review(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  OSTP Data Response(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  OSTP Publications Response(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Reed Elsevier submission to House of Lords Science and Technology Committee inquiry on OA policy implementation(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Reed Elsevier submission to House of Commons BIS Select Committee inquiry on Government Open Access policy(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier response to the Finch Report(새 탭/창에서 열기)

목적이 있는 기술

• ●

  Elsevier endorses Leiden Manifesto to guide its development of improved research evaluation

• ●

  Elsevier endorses the Sorbonne declaration on research data rights(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier endorses the European Open Science Cloud Declaration(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier response to Concordat on Open Research Data(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  NIH Request for Information (RFI): Metrics to Assess Value of Biomedical Digital Repositories(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  NIH Request for Information (RFI): Input on Sustaining Biomedical Data Repositories(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  NIH Request for Information (RFI): Input on National Cancer Institute Metadata Repository and Services(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Elsevier’s Response to Request for Information: Input on NIAID Data Sharing Repository, Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), and Services Part 1(새 탭/창에서 열기) and Part 2(새 탭/창에서 열기)

기타 선언

• ●

  Open letter in response to the request for Elsevier to withdraw its Text and Data Mining policy(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  Request for Information (RFI): Soliciting Input for the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Strategic Planning Process(새 탭/창에서 열기)

• ●

  도서관 자금 제공을 위한 지원

  • ●

    Letter to the Subcommittee on Labor, Health & Human Services, and Education, House Appropriations Committee(새 탭/창에서 열기)

  • ●

    Letter to the Subcommittee on Labor, Health & Human Services, and Education, Senate Appropriations Committee(새 탭/창에서 열기)