Reviewers play an essential part in science and in scholarly publishing. For more than 300 years , scientists and scholars have relied upon peer review to validate research, engage other specialists in the support of submitted work, and increase networking possibilities within specific specialist communities.
Although in recent years the peer review process has attracted some criticism, it remains the only widely accepted method for research validation and a cornerstone of the scientific publishing process.
Elsevier, like most scientific publishing companies, relies on effective peer review processes to uphold not only the quality and validity of individual articles, but also the overall integrity of the journals we publish.
The Reviewers' Information Pack provides practical information for the new and experienced Reviewers who review for Elsevier journals. Included in this pack are resources to help you expedite the process of reviewing papers, Elsevier publishing policy and procedures, and advice from other Reviewers and Editors.
Check out our Reviewers' Update : Information on developments in peer review, the Elsevier submission & peer review system and other ways to support reviewers in their important task to safeguard the scientific quality of journals. Find out what is coming up in Issue 3, November 2009
Most reviewers are authors, researchers, or sometimes editors in their own right. The peer review process allows these authors and editors an opportunity to use and develop their own expertise in a number of significant ways.
Many of our journals' Guide for Authors contain information about the peer review policy and have important information on aims and scope of the journal, which will be useful for reviewers