Peer Review Policy Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Structure and Expression
Peer Review Policy Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Structure and Expression
The practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below.
Initial manuscript evaluation
The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review.
Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.
Type of Peer Review
This journal employs single blind review, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process.
How the referee is selected
Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.
Referee reports
Referees generally comment upon whether the manuscript has met several or all of the following criteria: • Is original • Is methodologically sound • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines • Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions • Correctly references previous relevant work
Referees are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.
How long does the review process take?
The review process is typically completed within one to two months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or if a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion may sometimes be sought by the Editor. Revised manuscripts are handled at the Editor's discretion and may be re-evaluated. Even when re-review by initial referee(s) is required, the review process is generally completed in less time than the original review round. Editors may request more than one revision of a manuscript. Referees are expected to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
Final report
A final decision to accept, revise or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.
Editor's Decision is final
Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.
Special thematic issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organisers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office.
Becoming a Referee for Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
If you are not currently a referee for BBA but would like to be added to the list of referees for this title, please contact the editorial office at BBAEO@Elsevier.com. The benefits of refereeing for BBA include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in an annual statement in the journal if you have reviewed in the preceding twelve months. You may also be able to cite your work for BBA as part of your professional development requirements for various Professional Societies and Organisations.
