Guide for Authors
The journal of injury, function and rehabilitation
Official scientific journal of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(AAPM&R)
PM&R INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
• INTRODUCTION
• ONLINE
MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION
• CONDITIONS FOR SUBMISSION
• SUBMISSION
CATEGORIES
• MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION
• MANUSCRIPT
REVISIONS
• ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
INTRODUCTION
PM&R is the official scientific journal of the
American
Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R). It is a monthly, peer reviewed, scholarly publication that
advances education and impacts the specialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation through the timely delivery of clinically relevant
and evidence-based research and review information. Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic
conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults
and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis.
PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function and rehabilitation,
and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines.
Submission of manuscripts is encouraged from physiatrists, other multidisciplinary rehabilitation professionals and related disciplines.
ONLINE MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION
All manuscripts must be submitted on-line at
http://ees.elsevier.com/pmrjournal.
First-time users: Please click the Register button from the main menu and enter the requested information. For those previously registered
with EES (for other Elsevier journals), please be advised that registration for
PM&R is still required as the EES database
is separate and distinct for each journal. This registration process is required one time only. On successful registration, you will
be sent an e-mail indicating your user name and password, which can thereafter be modified to your preference.
CONDITIONS
FOR SUBMISSION
The "Conditions For Submission" form must be signed by all authors and accompany the manuscript at
the time of submission. This form is available online at
http://ees.elsevier.com/pmrjournal. It may be uploaded electronically
with the manuscript, emailed to
pmrjournal@aapmr.org or faxed to 312 245-3913.
This form stipulates the following:
author(s)' warranty of responsibilities, author(s)' rights, copyright transfer agreement, exclusive publication statement, disclosure
of conflict of interest, adherence to Institutional Review Board (IRB) or animal care committee policies (if applicable), identification
of funding source (including National Institutes of Health status, if applicable), and device status (if applicable).
YOUR MANUSCRIPT
WILL NOT PROCEED WITH THE REVIEW PROCESS UNTIL THE COMPLETED FORM IS RECEIVED BY THE EDITORIAL OFFICE.
Corresponding Author:
A single author of the manuscript is required to serve as the primary correspondent with the
PM&R editorial office, to accept
responsibility for addressing revision recommendations from
PM&R reviewers and editors, to review final page proofs, and
to make decisions regarding release of information to media outlets or government agencies. The corresponding author is also responsible
for providing statistical data if requested by the editor-in-chief and is responsible for identifying names, addresses and affiliations
of all undisclosed writers who have contributed to this submitted manuscript. All authors must agree ahead of manuscript submission the
identity of the corresponding author designee.
Author(s)' Warranty: Any person listed as a manuscript author should have made
substantive intellectual contributions to the study as established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE,
www.icmje.org). All authors should meet all of the following conditions with
regard to the manuscript: (1) substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation
of data; (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (3) final approval of the version to
be published; and (4) taking public responsibility for its content.
PM&R may require authors to justify the assignment of
authorship.
Multi-center trials present a unique situation in which a single corporate author is not acceptable. All members of the
group who are named as authors, either in the authorship position below the title or in a footnote, must fully meet the criteria for
authorship as defined. Group members not meeting these criteria should be listed, with their permission, in the acknowledgments. Permission
must be obtained in writing from persons acknowledged for contributions other than technical, secretarial or financial support. The authors
warrant that the entire manuscript is an original product of the author(s) and represents honest and valid work. Finally, the order of
authorship is a joint decision of, and must have been agreed to by, all of the authors.
Author(s)' Rights: The AAPM&R
hereby licenses the following rights back to the author(s):
-
(1) Patent and trademark rights to any process or procedure
described in the article;
(2) The right to photocopy or make single electronic copies of the article for their own personal use,
including for teaching purposes within an educational environment, or for the personal use of colleagues, provided that the copies are
not sold or systematically distributed in paper or electronically. Posting of the article on a secure network (not accessible to the
public) within the author(s)' home institution is permitted;
(3) The right, subsequent to electronic or print publication, to use
the article or any part thereof, free of charge in a printed compilation of works of their own, such as collected writings or lecture
notes.
Note: All copies, paper or electronic, or other use of the information include an indication of the AAPM&R copyright
and a full citation of the journal source.
Copyright Transfer Agreement: In consideration of the action of
PM&R
reviewing, editing and accepting this manuscript (including text, tables, figures, audio, video and/or other supplemental files) for
publication, the author(s) agree to transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental
thereto, exclusively to the AAPM&R, in the event that this work is published in
PM&R. If your manuscript is not accepted
for publication, then all said rights return to the author(s). For officers or employees of the U.S. government, AAPM&R recognizes
that works prepared as part of their official government duties are in the public domain, but they must still sign the Conditions for
Submission form.
Exclusive Publication Statement: The author(s) certify that this manuscript and the material within this
manuscript have not been previously published in print or electronic formats in part or in whole, nor is this manuscript and materials
within this manuscript currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. This includes symposia, transactions, books, journals,
invited articles, and preliminary publications. This restriction does not apply to abstracts of less than 500 words or press reports
published in conjunction with scientific meetings.
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest: Each author has reviewed
PM&R's
policy on Conflict of Interest and has completed the Disclosure Form (at
http://ees.elsevier.com/pmrjournal ) which must
be returned to the
PM&R editorial office along with the Conditions for Submission Form. A notation of a conflict of interest
will be included as a footnote on the first page of the article.
Human Studies: It is the author's responsibility to ensure
that a patient's anonymity be carefully protected and to verify that any experimental investigation with human subjects reported in the
manuscript was performed with informed consent and following all the guidelines for experimental investigation with human subjects required
by the institution(s) with which all the authors are affiliated. Authors should mask patients' face and remove patients' names from figures
unless they obtain written consent from the patients and submit written consent with the manuscript.
Authors from US institutions
must comply with all regulations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.
If an IRB exists at
the institution(s) in which any study involving human subjects is conducted, the investigators must obtain prior approval. This requirement
applies to prospective and retrospective studies (including technical notes and case reports) that involve any direct interaction with
patients OR evaluation or review of private information (eg, imaging studies or chart reviews).
If the IRB at the participating institution
does not require approval for the type of research being performed, a statement to this effect must be included in the manuscript. If
no IRB existed at the time the study was initiated, the authors must include a statement in the manuscript indicating as such and that
principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (
http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/helsinki.php3 ) were followed. If a manuscript reports
on the emergent use of a material or device not approved by the Food and Drug Administration or accepted as standard of practice, the
authors must state that they obtained informed consent from the patient (when feasible) and reported the case to the local IRB within
1 week of the event. This procedure is only valid for a single patient.
Animal Studies: Manuscripts reporting research involving
animals must include a statement that either the protocol was approved by an institutional animal care board or that the animal care
complied with the "Principles of Laboratory Care" (formulated by the National Society for Medical Research) or the "Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals" (National Institutes of Health).
Funding Source: All manuscripts must include (on the title
page) a statement of the source of funding of the study (if applicable). This information will appear as a footnote on the first page
of the article.
US National Institutes of Health (NIH) "Public Access Policy":
For works that have received NIH funding (confirmed
by NIH
grant number), Elsevier will deposit to PubMed Central (PMC) the
final peer-reviewed accepted manuscripts on behalf of PM&R
authors. This service will help authors comply with the NIH policy
that requires NIH-funded authors submit to PubMed Central
(PMC), or
have submitted on their behalf, their peer-reviewed
author manuscripts, to appear on PMC no later than 12 months
after final publication.
Device Status: A statement (appearing on the title page of the manuscript) regarding the presence or absence of the use of any
medical devices in the study is required. A notation will appear as a footnote on the first page of the article. If a medical device(s)
is discussed, then a statement regarding its legal/regulatory status is required including FDA status (e.g. approved for indicated use,
investigational, exempt from regulations (and why), not approved, or unknown).
SUBMISSION CATEGORIES
The content of
PM&R includes articles that are contemporary and important to research, clinical practice, and education
and training. The corresponding author will be required to identify for which category the manuscript is submitted. Each category has
different submission requirements in terms of style, length and format. Please review the specific submission category sections for detailed
submission information. Manuscripts that do not adhere to the following instructions may be returned to the corresponding author for
technical revision before undergoing peer review.
Unsolicited submissions that will be considered for peer review:
-
Original research
Basic science and clinical research including observational prospective or retrospective cohort studies,
randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies and clinically relevant translational science. The manuscript
text should be limited to 5,000 words excluding references, tables and figures, which should be used when necessary to extend the understanding
of the text. All original research manuscripts must be accompanied by a structured abstract of no more than 300 words that is described
in detail below (see Manuscript Preparation). The text should include the following sections: introduction, methods (subjects, procedures,
outcome measures, etc.), results (including reporting of statistical analysis with text as well as supplemental tables and figures),
discussion (including interpretation of findings, clinical impact and applicability of results, and strengths and weaknesses of the study)
and conclusion.
Case presentations
A case study or case series reporting on a new or unusual syndrome or medical condition,
new diagnostic method, or highlight of an important clinical complication of a common condition. The manuscript should be limited to
1,500 words excluding references, tables and figures. The text should include the following sections: introduction, presentation of the
case report or series, and discussion. An abstract is not necessary. References should be limited to 10 (ten) and at least one figure
should be included, but a maximum of two figures allowed.
Reviews
-
Clinical Review: Current
Concepts
A comprehensive report on a topic relating to physical medicine and rehabilitation that has broad general interest and
serves to define the field. The subject matter should be contemporary with significant development or progress within the past five years.
The review must be in-depth and evidence-based including a comprehensive review of the literature, a critique of the fundamental issue(s)
and a discussion of clinical implications. The author(s) should also provide insightful analysis, and when necessary, provide balanced
viewpoints. The manuscript should be no longer than 6,000 words, excluding references, tables and figures. The components of the Current
Concepts review include an abstract (a summary of no more than 250 words-not a structured abstract), introduction (which includes a statement
of the purpose of the review), literature review, discussion (see above), and a brief conclusion.
Clinical Review: Focused
A Focused review is a discussion on an important issue relating to physical medicine and rehabilitation with limited scope, but significant
relevance or interest to researchers and/or clinicians. Focused reviews generally address newer information that may not yet have wide
dissemination or applicability, but the recognition and exposure of such information is considered important to a substantial number
of practitioners in the field. The manuscript should be limited to 2,500 words excluding references (limit of 20 [twenty]), and tables
and figures (limit of 3 [three]). The components of the Focused Review include an abstract (summary of no more than 250 words-not a structured
abstract), introduction (including a statement of the purpose of the review), a focused review of the literature (evidence-based when
possible) and a thorough discussion of the subject matter.
Critical Review
A systematic review (e.g. meta-analysis) of
a major topic within the specialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation that addresses a clinically relevant question related to diagnosis,
treatment, outcome or prognosis. The topic must have enough scientific basis to justify the review and the authors should also have demonstrated
expertise in the area. Methodological criteria, relying on the principles of evidence based medicine, should be used to assess the topic
in regards to the process by which existing data was collected and the relevance of the results.
Manuscripts should be limited to
6,000 words, excluding references, tables and figures. Critical reviews should include the following sections: structured abstract (see
Manuscript Preparation); introduction (explaining the question or problem being studied and rationale); methodology (including a detailed
description of the computerized literature search and process of including and excluding papers for review); results (reporting and analysis)
including a detailed summary table that lists articles stratified by level of evidence, participants, outcomes, key findings, and commentary);
discussion (an overall synthesis of the literature using objective more than subjective criteria) and conclusion (in bullet point format).
Although unsolicited manuscripts will be considered, the authors should present to the Editor-in-Chief a preliminary, concise outline
of the article, including author(s)' curriculum vitae, for approval prior to submitting a Critical Review.
In Brief
-
Clinical pearls
A brief vignette describing a new or unique diagnostic or treatment method for a specific medical
condition or category that would have relevance to the average physiatrist or practitioner in another rehabilitation discipline. This
should include a short review of the history of previous methods, a description of the new method, and justification for the basis of
the new approach. The Clinical Pearls do not have to be presented with a specific case. These manuscripts should be no more than 1,000
words (excluding references) with no more than two figures or tables.
Emerging issues
A short technical report of a new
or emerging technology, treatment or device, with relevance to the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. These manuscripts should
be no longer than 750 words (excluding references) with a limit of one figure or table.
Images
A column presenting images
(e.g. radiographs, CT, MRI, electrodiagnostic tracings, pathology, physical examination findings) that are unique, interesting, pertinent
and relevant to the understanding of health and disease in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation. All images should be accompanied
by a short description of the image and relevant relationship to clinical care or research science of no more than 500 words (excluding
references) with references limited to 5 (five).
Letters
Letters to the editor are encouraged and will be considered for
publication at the Editor-in-Chief's discretion. All letters should be brief (no more than 750 words) and relate to the specific article
being commented on. Letters should not reference any unpublished literature and references are limited to no more than 5 (five). Letters
are also subject to editorial modification.
Articles Solicited by Editor-in-Chief and Senior Editors only:
-
Point-counterpoint
A debate format of a specific question, usually based on a controversial therapeutic intervention,
but could include a theoretical dilemma, diagnostic uncertainty, or other topic in physical medicine and rehabilitation, through which
two parties with legitimate opposing perspectives present arguments to support their viewpoints. This column allows more editorial freedom
than a critical review, but the basis of these viewpoints should include scientifically sound arguments supported by available medical
evidence as well as personal experience and perspective. Each of the two portions of the manuscript should be no greater than 1,500 words
(excluding references) with references limited to no more than 15 (fifteen). No abstract is required, but a brief introduction stating
the writer's viewpoint should be included as part of the text. Figures and tables are not required.
Practice management
A column that focuses on a contemporary issue in clinical physiatric practice relating to health policy, business and/or medical issues
such as coding and billing, practice innovations, and new trends in physiatric education/training after residency/fellowship. Manuscripts
should be no more than 2,500 words and include an introduction, presentation of the main issue(s) including a comprehensive discussion
of clinical implications, and a brief conclusion. There should be no more than 15 (fifteen) references and figures or tables should be
limited to two.
Ethical-legal topics
An in-depth assessment of a specific topic in physical medicine and rehabilitation
that raises questions and concerns across the medical, ethical and legal fields. Depending on the topic, the column may include either,
or both, an ethical and legal perspective which provides the reader with a unique or new perspective on the subject. (If both a legal
and ethical piece are presented, these may represent convergent or divergent ideas). The total word count for this column is 3,000 words,
with each of the two portions of the manuscript no greater than 1,500 words (excluding references) with references limited to no more
than 15 (fifteen). No abstract is required, but a brief introduction stating the purpose of the discussion should be included as part
of the text. Figures and tables are not required.
Invited Perspective
Invited commentaries or viewpoints on contemporary
topics in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation featuring medical diagnosis and treatment, educational and medical training,
socioeconomic factors and others topics. These are usually solicited from experts and leaders in the field and are designed educate and
stimulate thought and discussion. Perspective discusses current conditions and future expectations and authors may add personal insight
and opinion. Manuscripts should be approximately 2,000 words and should include a brief non-structured abstract (no more than 250 words).
At the Editor-in-Chief's discretion, unsolicited Perspective manuscripts will be considered for publication, but it is strongly suggested
that potential authors contact the editorial office first.
MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION
These instructions generally follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (N Engl J Med 1997; 336:309
or see
http://www.icmje.org/index.html ). Once accepted, manuscripts are copy edited to conform to the Journal's standards
and style.
Format
The preferred word processing program is Microsoft Word. Manuscripts should be double-spaced throughout
(including tables, references, and figure legends), and have at least 3 cm margins. The text should be ragged right (no right justification).
Embedded instructions (eg, italics, underlines, boldface) should not be used or kept to a minimum Do not use coding for centering. Insert
only one space after punctuation marks. Sequential page numbering should begin with the abstract. The order of sections is Abstract,
Text, Acknowledgments, References, Tables, and Figure Legends. To ensure blinded peer-review, no direct references to the author(s) or
institution of origin should be made anywhere in the text or figures. To facilitate peer review, please add line numbers to the document.
Title Page
The first page of your manuscript should be a blind title page. As a separate document, include a title page
listing all authors' full names, highest academic degrees, and affiliations; name and address for correspondence, including fax number,
telephone number, and e-mail address; and whether the material was presented at an AAPM&R Annual Assembly. Indicate any funding source
and provide grant numbers for NIH funding.
Structured Abstracts
The structured abstract is necessary for original
research and critical review articles. The structured abstract should be no more than 300 words, appear on the page following the title
page, and use the following headings and information:
-
For Original Research Articles:
Objective: State the
main question or objective of the study and the major hypothesis tested, if any.
Design: Describe the design of the study,
indicating, as appropriate, use of randomization, blinding, criterion standards for diagnostic tests, temporal direction (retrospective
or prospective), and so on.
Setting: Indicate the study setting, including the level of clinical care (e.g., primary or tertiary,
private practice or institutional).
Patients (or Participants): State selection procedures, entry criteria, and numbers of
participants entering and finishing the study.
Methods or Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors): Describe essential
features of any interventions, including their method and duration of administration. For observational studies, clearly outline the
independent variables.
Main Outcome Measurements: The primary study outcome measures (dependent variables) should be indicated
as planned before data collection began. If the hypothesis being reported was formulated during or after data collection, this fact should
be clearly stated.
Results: Report the main findings of the study.
Conclusions: State only those conclusions of
the study that are directly supported by data, along with their clinical application (avoiding overgeneralization) or whether additional
study is required before the information should be used in usual clinical settings.
For Critical Review Articles:
Objective:
State the primary objective of the review article.
Data Sources: Describe the data sources that were searched, including dates,
terms, and constraints.
Study Selection: Identify the number of studies reviewed and the criteria used for their selection.
Data Extraction: Summarize guidelines used for abstracting data and how they were applied.
Data Synthesis: State
the main results of the review and the methods used to obtain these results.
Conclusions: State primary conclusions and their
clinical applications, avoiding overgeneralization. Suggest areas for additional research if needed.
Acknowledgments
On a separate page, list any significant contributors to the conduct of the study or preparation of the manuscript other than your co-authors.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from persons acknowledged for reasons other than technical, secretarial, or financial
support.
Style
Follow the American Medical Association (AMA) Manual of Style, 10th edition. Stedman's Medical Dictionary
(27th edition) and Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (10th edition) should be used as standard references. Use nonproprietary names
of drugs, devices, and other products, unless the specific trade name of a drug is essential to the discussion. Capitalize trade names
and place them in parentheses after the generic names. Include the name and location (city and state in USA; city and country outside
USA.) of the manufacturer of any drug, supply, or equipment mentioned in the manuscript. Use the metric system to express units of measure
and degrees Celsius to express temperatures, and use SI units rather than conventional units.
Laboratory slang and clinical jargon
should be avoided. Keep unique abbreviations to a minimum. Spell out the full term for each abbreviation at first use in the text unless
it is a standard unit of measure.
References
The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the references. Key the
references (double spaced) at the end of the manuscript. They should be cited in the text in the order of appearance. Cite unpublished
data, such as papers submitted but not yet accepted for publication or personal communications, in parentheses in the text.
For
journal articles with six or fewer authors, list surnames and initials of all authors. If there are more than seven authors, name only
the first three authors and then use et al. Refer to the List of Journals Indexed in Index Medicus for abbreviations of journal names,
or access the list at
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/tsd/serials/lji.html . Sample references are given below:
-
Journal
article
1. Cup EH, Pieterse AJ, ten Broek-Pastoor JM, et al. Exercise therapy and other types of physical therapy for patients
with neuromuscular diseases: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88:1452-1464.
Book chapter
2.
Leonard JA, Meier RH. Upper and lower extremity prosthetics. In: Delisa JA, Gans BM, eds. Rehabilitation Medicine Principles and Practice.
Philadelphia, PA: JP Lippincott; 1998, 669-696.
Entire book
3. Stewart JD, ed. Focal Peripheral Neuropathies.
3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
Online journal
4. Tsao CC, Mirbagheri MM.
Upper limb impairments associated with spasticity in neurological disorders. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2007, 4:45
doi:10.1186/1743-0003-4-45. Available at
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/4/1/45 . Accessed December 27, 2007.
World Wide Web
5. Madans, J. The definition and measurement of disability: the work of the Washington Group. Powerpoint
presentation, November 2006. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/citygroup.htm . Accessed June 1, 2007.
If reference
is made in the text to personal communication (oral or written) as a source of information, a signed statement is required from the source.
Tables
Create tables using the table creating and editing feature of your word processing software (eg, Word, WordPerfect).
Do not use Excel or comparable spreadsheet programs. Group all tables at the end of the manuscript, or supply them together in a separate
file. Number and cite tables consecutively in the text. Each table should start on a separate sheet, and include the table title, appropriate
column heads, and explanatory legends (including definitions of any abbreviations used). Tables should supplement, rather than duplicate,
the material in the text.
Figures
Electronic art should be created/scanned and saved and submitted as either a TIFF (tagged
image file format) or as an EPS (encapsulated postscript) file. Figures must be cited in the text and numbered in order of first mention.
Make sure that the figure number is marked clearly on the figure or part of the electronic file name (i.e., Figure1.tif). Line art must
have a resolution of at least 1200 dpi (dots per inch), and electronic photographs, radiographs, CT scans, and scanned images must have
a resolution of at least 300 dpi. Images should be supplied at a size that approximates the final figure size in the print journal. If
fonts are used in the artwork, they must be converted to paths or outlines or they must be embedded in the files. Color images must be
created/scanned and saved and submitted as CMYK files. Please note that artwork generated from office suite programs such Corel Draw
and MS Word and artwork downloaded from the Internet (JPEG or GIFF files) cannot be used. Color illustrations are published at the discretion
of the editorial office without additional charge to authors.
For step-by-step instructions and screenshots on how to create your
art correctly, go to
http://ees.elsevier.com/pmrjournal and click on
Artwork
Guidelines under "Author Information".
Figure legends
Legends must be submitted for all figures. They should
be brief and specific, and they should appear on a separate manuscript page after the references. Use scale markers in the image for
electron micrographs, and indicate the type of stain used.
MANUSCRIPT REVISIONS
Manuscripts returned to authors for revisions must be resubmitted (with revisions) within two months to be considered for publication.
Revised manuscript submission must include: a cover letter, the revised manuscript, and a letter itemizing, point by point, the response
to each one of the suggestions/criticisms raised by the referees, highlighting the response and revisions made to the manuscript, or
providing justifiable rebuttal.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTS
Page proofs and corrections
Corresponding authors will receive page proofs to check the copyedited and typeset article before publication. Portable document format
(PDF) files of the typeset pages and support documents (e.g., reprint order form) will be sent to the corresponding author via e-mail.
Complete instructions will be provided with the e-mail for downloading and printing the files and for faxing the corrected pages to the
publisher. It is the author's responsibility to ensure that there are no errors in the proofs. Changes that have been made to conform
to Journal style will stand if they do not alter the authors' meaning. Only the most critical changes to the accuracy of the content
will be made. The publisher reserves the right to deny any changes that do not affect the accuracy of the content. Authors may be charged
for alterations to the proofs beyond those required to correct errors or to answer queries. Proofs must be checked carefully and corrections
returned within 48 hours of receipt, as requested in the email accompanying the page proofs.
Reprints
Authors will receive
a reprint order form and a price list from the Publisher. Reprint requests should be faxed with the corrected proofs, if possible. Reprints
are normally shipped 6 to 8 weeks after publication of the issue in which the item appears. Contact the
authorsupport@elsevier.com
with questions regarding author reprint orders.
Additional material only for electronic version
Under special circumstances,
PM&R will allow publication of additional tables, figures, or text (e.g., Methodology, explanations of analysis, etc) in
the electronic version of the published manuscript only. This material will not be included in the print version but a reference to it
being available online will be present in the print version. The Editor would like to emphasize that such additional material will have
to meet strict criteria to be included in the electronic version; such material may be used to complement the data in the printed version.
If deemed by the authors or Editor as crucial to the interpretation of the manuscript, this material should be included as part of the
printed version of the manuscript. Please mark clearly in the submitted manuscript that this is additional information to be published
electronically. The electronic version should not be used as a repository for redundant or unnecessary data.
Video Clips for
electronic version: We accept and encourage submission of video clips with accepted manuscripts, to be viewed in the online version
of the article, but only if such images are pertinent and complementary to the manuscript, and nonoffensive.
Rights and Permissions
Direct quotations, tables, or illustrations that have appeared in copyrighted material must be accompanied by written permission for
their use from the copyright owner and original author along with complete information as to the source. Photographs of identifiable
persons must be accompanied by signed releases, showing informed consent. Articles appear in both the printed and online versions of
PM&R and wording of the release should specify permission in all forms and media. Failure to get electronic permission rights
may result in the images not appearing in the online version.
January 2009