Guide for Authors
Guide for Authors
Behavior Therapy
is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral
and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended
for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle
for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis
is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be
published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
Manuscript Requirements
All manuscripts
should be prepared in conformity with the format described in the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association,
Fifth Edition (2001), and it is the responsibility of the author that manuscripts adhere to the format and other requirements of Behavior
Therapy.
The activities described in manuscripts published in the journal should be consistent with the generally accepted standards
of ethical practice.
Authors are strongly encouraged to submit online via the
Elsevier Editorial System (EES) page at
http://ees.elsevier.com/bt. Authors, reviewers and editors send and receive
all correspondence by e-mail and no paper correspondence is necessary. Full, detailed information about this electronic submission process
and specific instructions on how to submit manuscripts can be found at the EES page. Problems encountered while submitting online can
be resolved by emailing
authorsupport@elsevier.com. Questions about a possible manuscript for
Behavior Therapy
may be discussed with the editor:
Thomas H. Ollendick, Ph.D.
Editor,
Behavior Therapy
Department of Psychology
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24060
USA
Phone: +1 540-231-6451
Fax: +1 540-231-8148
Email:
behavior.therapy@vt.edu
The journal uses a masked reviewing system for all submissions. You will be asked to provide two separate manuscript versions.
The first version should be a complete manuscript which includes all author information. The second version should omit the authors'
names and affiliations but should include the title of the manuscript and the date it is submitted. Footnotes containing information
pertaining to the authors' identity or affiliations should not be included in the second version of the manuscript, and every effort
should be made to see that the manuscript itself contains no clues to the authors' identity.
Cover Letter (including Authors'
Names and Contact Information)
The cover letter accompanying the manuscript submission must include all authors' names and affiliations
to avoid potential conflicts of interest in the review process. Addresses and phone numbers, as well as email addresses and fax numbers,
should be provided for all authors for possible use by the editorial office and later by the production department.
Only original
papers will be considered. Manuscripts are accepted for review with the understanding that the same work has not been and will not be
published-nor is presently submitted-elsewhere, and that all persons listed as authors have given their approval for the submission of
the paper; further, that any person cited as a source of personal communications has approved such citation. Written authorization may
be required, at the Editor's discretion. Articles and any other material published in
Behavior Therapy represent the opinions
of the author(s) and should not be construed as reflecting the opinions of the Editors, the Association, or the Publisher.
Tables
and Figures: All tables and figures should be grouped together at the end of the manuscript and numbered separately using Arabic
numerals. Clearly visible notes within the text should indicate their approximate placement.
Please see the EES web page http://ees.elsevier.com/bt for full detailed instructions.
Keywords: Authors should include 3 to 5 keywords on the submission.
Author
Inquiries: For inquiries relating to the submission of articles, please visit the EES page at
http://ees.elsevier.com/bt.
EES also provides the facility to track manuscripts.
English language help service: Upon request Elsevier will direct authors
to an agent who can check and improve the English of their paper (
before submission). Please contact
authorsupport@elsevier.com
for further information.
Copyright
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to transfer copyright to ABCT.
This transfer will ensure the widest possible dissemination of information. A letter will be sent to the corresponding author confirming
receipt of the manuscript. A form facilitating transfer of copyright will be provided.
If excerpts from other copyrighted works are
included, the author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s) in the article. Elsevier has
forms for use by authors in these cases available at
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions
phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail:
permissions@elsevier.com
Proofs
When your
manuscript is received by the Publisher it is considered to be in its final form - please do not regards Proofs as 'drafts'.
One
set of page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author, to be checked for typesetting/editing. No changes in, or additions to, the
accepted (and subsequently edited) manuscript will be allowed at this stage. Authors are responsible for correcting proofs of their articles.
The Publisher reserves the right to proceed with publication if corrections are not communicated in a timely manner. Should there be
no corrections, please confirm this.
Offprints
Twenty-five offprints will be supplied
free of charge. Additional
offprints and copies of the issue can be ordered at a specially reduced rate using the order form sent to the corresponding author after
the manuscript has been accepted. Orders for reprints (produced after publication of an article) will incur a 50% surcharge.
Journal
Policy Statement
Conflicts of Interest
A conflict of interest may exist when an author or the author's institution
has a financial or other relationship with other people or organizations that may inappropriately influence the author's work. A conflict
can be actual or potential and full disclosure to the Journal is the safest course. All submissions to the Journal must include disclosure
of all relationships that could be viewed as presenting a potential conflict of interest. The Journal will publish such disclosures.
A decision may be made by the Journal not to publish on the basis of the declared conflict if the conflict is clearly seen as influencing
the choice of subjects, methodology, and/or outcomes.
Disclosure Statement for Authors
At the end of the text, under a subheading
"Disclosure Statement", all authors must disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other
relationships with other people or organizations within three (3) years of beginning the work submitted that could inappropriately influence
(bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership,
honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should
be disclosed at the earliest possible stage. Unless the authors include a statement disclosing conflicts of interest, the corresponding
author will sign a statement to the effect that there is no real or potential conflict of interest.
The Role of your Funding
Source
If funding has been provided, all sources of funding must be declared. Authors must describe the role of the study sponsor(s),
if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to
submit the paper for publication. Authors must report any royalties that may be affected directly or indirectly from material contained
in the paper.
Reporting Standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the
work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper.
A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements
constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw
data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the
ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable
time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original
works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple,
Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not submit and certainly may not publish manuscripts describing essentially
the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently
constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Authors who wish to publish translations or adaptations (including
clinical guidelines, manuals) of a previously published paper should contact the publisher to discuss such a submission. The primary
reference must be cited in the secondary publication.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of
others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without
explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts
or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception,
design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed
as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included
on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual
hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human
subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant
laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) have approved them and whether the procedures followed
were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and
with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent
was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
Fundamental
errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the
author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor
or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the editor to
inform the author and for the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of
the original paper.
Duties of Reviewers
Reviewers who feel unqualified to review a manuscript or know that its prompt
review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse him- or herself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for
review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly
with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not
been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied
by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript
under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the express written
consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal
advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative,
or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Advertising
Policy
For
advertisers in ABCT periodicals, the following is the procedure:
Staff will include ABCT's nondiscrimination
policy in advertising rate sheets. Staff will provide advertisers with the nondiscrimination policy and require statements from them
on how they differ from our policy. This will apply to some, but not all, advertisers. It applies only to those who are advertising
job or training opportunities (so booksellers and publishers, unless they're looking for someone to sell books or help with redaction,
are exempt, as long as they're advertising books, journals, conferences, and the like). The following statement will appear on the advertising
rate sheet:
It is the policy of the Board of Directors of ABCT that all advertisers for jobs or training positions review the ABCT
nondiscrimination policy.
The Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies is committed to a policy of equal opportunity
in all of its activities, including employment. ABCT does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national or
ethnic origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, or veteran status
.
If the advertiser's
own policy differs from the ABCT policy, then that must be stated in the ad. We recommend that wording similar to the following be used:
"Please note the nondiscrimination policy of xxx differs from the ABCT policy in that it does not include age, sexual orientation, or
gender identity and expression." This wording appears ONLY if your non-discrimination policy differs from ABCT's. For those advertisers
who are not offering jobs or training opportunities (for instance, book sellers or VR distributors), this does not apply.
Following
is our accepted advertising Policy in ABCT's policy and procedure manual
Policies Regarding Advertising
Advertisements
must meet all relevant legal, professional, and ethical guidelines. ABCT publications are published for, and on behalf of, the membership
and the cognitive and behavioral therapies community.
The Association reserves the right to unilaterally reject, omit, or cancel
advertising which, by its tone, content, or appearance, is not in keeping with the essentially scientific, scholarly, and professional
nature of its publications or the goals of the organization. The Association reserves the right to refuse ads that, because of omissions
or inaccuracies, provide misleading or incorrect information. The Director of Communications, acting on behalf of the Editor, has the
full and final authority for approving advertisements and enforcing advertising policy for those ads submitted to the Association. Ads
submitted to Elsevier running in multiple journals fall under the purview of Elsevier's publisher or its representative.
Publication
of any advertisement by ABCT is neither an endorsement of the advertiser nor of the products or services advertised. ABCT is not responsible
for any claims made in an advertisement. Advertisers and advertising agencies assume liability for all content (including text representation
and illustrations) of advertisements printed, and also assume responsibility for any claims arising therefrom made against the Publisher.
The Publisher's liability for any error will not exceed the charge for the advertisement in question.
Correspondence
Readers may submit comments or criticisms about published articles to our sister publication,
the Behavior Therapist. The
authors of articles discussed in correspondence will be given an opportunity to respond, preferably in the same issue in which the original
correspondence appears.
Randomized Clinical Trials: Use of CONSORT Reporting Standards
Title of Manuscript
The title
of a manuscript should be accurate, fully explanatory, and preferably no longer than 12 words. The title should reflect the content
and population(s) studied. If the paper reports a randomized clinical trial (RCT), this should be indicated in the title, and the CONSORT
(Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) criteria must be used for reporting purposes.
ABCT Journals require the registration
of all clinical trials in a public trials registry. These registries set standards for the uniform reporting of the minimum registration
data set as determined by the World Health Organization and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov,
http://www.anzctr.org.au,
http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr,
http://www.isrctn.com,
http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp/).
Clinical trials are defined as any study that prospectively assigns human subjects to intervention or comparison groups to evaluate
the cause-and-effect relationship between an intervention and an outcome.
Manuscripts that report randomized clinical trials are
required to include a flow diagram of the progress through the phases of the trial and a checklist that identifies where in the manuscript
the various criteria are addressed (see
www.consort-statement.org for a full description of reporting procedures). The
checklist should be placed in an Appendix of the manuscript for review purposes. When a study is not fully consistent with the CONSORT
statement, the limitation should be acknowledged and discussed in the text of the manuscript. ABCT journals do not view single case
studies as being included among randomized clinical trials and are, therefore, exempt for these standards.
For follow-up studies
of previously published clinical trials, authors should submit a flow diagram of the progress through the phases of the trial and follow-up.
The CONSORT checklist should be completed to the extent possible, especially for the Results and Discussion sections of the manuscript.
ABCT Journals require the use of the CONSORT reporting standards (e.g., a checklist and flow diagram) for randomized clinical trials,
consistent with the policy established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' Uniform Requirements for Medical Journals.