The Journal of Biomedical Informatics (formerly Computers and Biomedical Research) has been redesigned to reflect a
commitment to high-quality original research papers and reviews in the area of biomedical informatics. Although published articles are
motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, ... click here for full Aims & Scope
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics (formerly Computers and Biomedical Research) has been redesigned to reflect a
commitment to high-quality original research papers and reviews in the area of biomedical informatics. Although published articles are
motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, imaging, and bioinformatics),
the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving
science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices, and formal evaluations of completed systems, including clinical trials
of information technologies, would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing
and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information
management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals. System descriptions
are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report.
CONSIDERING
SUBMITTING TO JBI? READ THIS SUMMARY TO LEARN WHAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE JOURNAL.
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics
(JBI), first published by Academic Press in 1968 under the title Computers and Biomedical Research (CBR), was redesigned and
renamed beginning with Volume 34 in 2001. Building on a strong 33-year history since CBR premiered in 1968, we made a number of changes
to update and reorient the journal in light of the evolution of the field, while simultaneously seeking to fill a niche not clearly identified
as a central focus by the other journals that publish papers in biomedical informatics research. We stated that goal as follows in our
inaugural editorial:
"It is increasingly difficult to publish articles that will have broad appeal to a diverse readership.
We have accordingly decided that it is important to introduce a tighter focus to the journal in the years ahead, and it is with this
in mind that we have renamed the journal to reflect a more modern and narrow emphasis. The Journal of Biomedical Informatics (JBI) is
intended to complement rather than to compete with the other major journals in biomedical informatics. In particular, we wish to emphasize
papers the elucidate methodologies that generalize across biomedical domains and that help to form the scientific basis for the field.
Papers will tend to be concerned with information technology rather than medical devices, and on underlying methods rather than system
descriptions or summative evaluations. You should expect this journal to be an excellent source of new ideas about how to tackle difficult
problems that arise in the development of computational solutions to problems in the biomedical sciences and clinical practice."
We are pleased by the subsequent success of the journal, with a growing impact factor every year, and hope that our readers and published
authors are similarly impressed by the quality of both the work and the writing that we have attracted to these pages. That quality
has come at some cost. In the early years of JBI, some papers that once would have been suitable for CBR were turned away without review
because they did not conform to the new editorial policy. It is now much less frequent, but we still get some papers that are returned
without review because the authors have either been unaware of our editorial focus or have not understood the implications of the changes
that we have announced.
JBI seeks to publish papers that make a conceptual contribution to the field, for example by describing
an innovation in methodology or techniques or by discussing substantive lessons that have been learned in the context of an interesting
informatics project. When a contribution has a theoretical basis, that theory is an appropriate emphasis for the exposition as well.
In the figure below we illustrate our view of the relationship between the scientific base in the field and the areas of application
that characterize work in biomedical informatics. In our experience, many research projects that start as applications efforts result
in methodologic innovation that, properly described, contributes to the scientific base of our discipline. Thus we are not discouraging
submissions (for example, about interesting applications) but, rather, encouraging a perspective on how best to write about and share
generalizable methodologic insights from which others can benefit and that form the core of biomedical informatics as a science.
There have been three principal reasons for returning papers without review. Perhaps the most common occurs when a paper is primarily
a description of an informatics application or its evaluation. For example, a new expert system that addresses an important clinical
problem, but that does not advance the methodologies underlying expert systems, would be more appropriate for another journal, either
in applied informatics or in the clinical domain of application. Similarly, survey studies or analyses of user needs are likely to be
suitable for JBI only if they contribute new methods for performing such studies or analyses, or new insights into user behavior, cognitive
science, or human computer interaction.
Legend: The relationship between biomedical
informatics methods, techniques, and theories and the domains of application that characterize the discipline. The Journal of Biomedical
Informatics seeks papers on basic research methods and conceptual insights that are biomedically motivated but that could potentially
be applied broadly in diverse domains, both within and outside biomedicine. Methods may be drawn from a large number of fields, including,
but not limited to, computer science, decision science, cognitive science, information science, psychology, management science, and statistics.
A second reason for returning papers without review occurs when a paper is best described as dealing with an approach to biomedical
signal or image processing, especially when the emphasis is on numerical methods rather than information processing and management or
knowledge-based approaches. We generally refer such papers to biomedical engineering journals or to clinical journals in the domain
of application (e.g., a cardiology journal for new approaches to electrocardiogram analysis, or an imaging journals for a new mathematical
approach to edge detection or image analysis).
Finally, although JBI is an international journal and we understand the challenges
that authors face when English is not their native language, some papers have such severe problems with their English exposition that
we return them for revision, suggesting the involvement of an editor or coauthor who is expert in English, before the paper can be judged
suitable for entry into the scientific review process. Minor problems with language can be corrected in the editorial process, but more
severe problems prevent an adequate assessment of the scientific contribution.
Of those papers that have gone to review, our eventual
acceptance rate is now about 35-40%. Almost every published paper has been accepted only after significant revisions, so authors should
not be surprised when revisions are required before a paper is ready for publication. We believe, however, that the rigor we have introduced
in the reviewing and revision process has resulted in a better, more scientifically useful product. For example, anecdotal feedback,
as well as citation and downloading data, suggest that the methodological reviews included in almost every issue have been widely used
for educational and study purposes.
We have received an increasing number of submitted papers in each year since the transition from
CBR to JBI. For example, there was a 20% increase in submissions in a single year (2007 when compared with 2006). As a result, the
journal has grown in size, with more papers per issue. We also devote two or three issues per year to special topics overseen by guest
editors who propose such special issues to us. Accepted papers are immediately made available online and are indexed in Medline, so
papers become accessible via web-based literature search tools well before they actually appear in printed form. For now, however, we
do continue to publish a print version of the journal. Several papers make use of color images or figures, and all are made available
online, even if cost constraints prevent us from making some of them available in color in the print journal.
We encourage you
to submit your best methodological work to JBI. Bear in mind that we provide opportunities for in-depth discussion of an innovative
approach, as judged by our reviewers as well as the editors, and have avoided any arbitrary limit on the length of individual articles.
We also encourage papers describing doctoral dissertation work, and emphasize that the extensive topic reviews undertaken in a thesis
document often can be adapted to develop an ideal methodology review article for the JBI. JBI also has no page charges.
Biomedical
informatics is a burgeoning field, with important applications and implications throughout the biomedical and clinical worlds. We are
eager to have the research community consistently identify JBI as the journal that best defines the scientific base for the field. We
accordingly invite both your contributions and your readership.
Home | Elsevier Sites | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Feedback | Site Map | A Reed Elsevier Company