Neurotoxicology and Teratology - Elsevier

SiteStat.jsp

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY

Sponsored by the Neurobehavioral Teratology Society NTT Peer Review Policy Reviewer Policy Statement The practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of Neurotoxicology and Teratology and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organisers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office. Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review. Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt. Type of Peer Review This journal employs single blind review, where the reviewer remains anonymous throughout the process. How the reviewer is selected Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used. Reviewer reports Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: Is original Is methodologically sound Follows appropriate ethical guidelines Has results which are clearly represented and support the conclusions Correctly references previous relevant work Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process. How long does the review process take? Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2-3 weeks. Should the reviewers? reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees within 3 weeks. Reviewers may request more than one revision of a manuscript. Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers. Editor?s Decision is final Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Becoming a Reviewer for Neurotoxicology and Teratology If you are not currently a reviewer for Neurotoxicology and Teratology but would like to be added to the list of reviewers for this title, please contact the editorial office. The benefits of reviewing include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in an annual statement in Neurotoxicology and Teratology if you have reviewed 1 or more manuscripts in the preceding 12 months. You may also be able to cite your work for Neurotoxicology and Teratology as part of your professional development requirements for various Professional Societies and Organisations.

Neurotoxicology and Teratology