Nuclear Engineering and Design - Elsevier

SiteStat.jsp

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN

An International Journal devoted to all aspects of Nuclear Fission Energy Affiliated with the European Nuclear Society (ENS) and with the International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, e.v. (IASMiRT) Peer Review Policy Statement for Nuclear Engineering and Design The practice of peer review is to ensure that good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing and is carried out on all reputable scientific journals. Our referees therefore play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of Nuclear Engineering and Design and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. Special issues and/or conference proceedings may have different peer review procedures involving, for example, Guest Editors, conference organisers or scientific committees. Authors contributing to these projects may receive full details of the peer review process on request from the editorial office. Initial manuscript evaluation The Editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review. Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt. Type of Peer Review This journal employs single blind review, where the referee remains anonymous throughout the process. How the referee is selected Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used. Referee reports Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript: - Is original - Is methodologically sound - Follows appropriate ethical guidelines - Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions - Correctly references previous relevant work Referees are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process. How long does the review process take? Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within 2-3 months. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees within 2 weeks. Referees may request more than one revision of a manuscript. Final report A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees. Editor's Decision is final Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Becoming a Referee for Nuclear Engineering and Design If you are not currently a referee for Nuclear Engineering and Design but would like to be added to the list of referees for this title, please contact the editorial office lohnert@ike.uni-stuttgart.de The benefits of refereeing for Nuclear Engineering and Design include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and you may be able to cite your work for Nuclear Engineering and Design as part of your professional development requirements for various Professional Societies and Organisations.

Nuclear Engineering and Design