New Diagnostic Test Can Detect Chlamydia Trachomatis in Less Than 20 Minutes
Philadelphia, PA, December 12, 2013
Assay Offers Potential for High Sensitivity Testing at
Point-of-Care Settings, Say Researchers in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Assay Offers Potential for High Sensitivity Testing at Point-of-Care Settings, Say Researchers in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
have developed a new assay for rapid and sensitive detection of Chlamydia
trachomatis, the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in
humans. This procedure takes less than 20 minutes and can be easily performed
at the point of care (POC) during the patient's visit, reports The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.
C. trachomatis affects 5% to 10% of the population and is particularly common in young adults under 25 years. It is a major public health concern due to its prevalence and potential severe long-term consequences. One of the main reasons it is so prevalent is that in the majority of cases (75% of women and 50% of men) there are minimal to no symptoms, and it therefore often goes undiagnosed. Infection is associated with non-gonococcal urethritis in men and several inflammatory reproductive tract syndromes in women such as inflammation of the uterine cervix and pelvic inflammatory disease. Untreated, the infection increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy and is one of the leading causes of female infertility worldwide.
The assay uses recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), a nucleic acid amplification technique (NAAT), to detect C. trachomatis directly from urine samples. Because the assay's novel approach does not require the purification of total DNA from the urine sample, the need for specialized equipment is eliminated. The procedure is significantly less laborious, less time-consuming, and consequently less expensive. It is relatively simple to perform and could therefore be applied in numerous POC settings.
"The assay enables highly specific C. trachomatis detection with sensitivity levels significantly improved compared to currently available C. trachomatis POC assays," says Ülo Langel, PhD, Professor of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Tartu, Estonia, and Professor of Neurochemistry,Stockholm University, Sweden.
Existing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques for testing C. trachomatis are widely applied but are only suitable for use in hospitals with trained staff and expensive machinery. Studies have shown that up to 50% of patients never return to get the diagnostic result or required treatment.
Although several rapid-diagnosis POC tests have already been developed, none offer a comparable sensitivity to hospital-based techniques. Recent independent studies have shown that currently available POC tests have a sensitivity of just 10% to 40%. Initial analysis of the new assay's performance indicated a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 83%, evidence of its potential reliability.
"The alarmingly poor performance of the available POC tests for C. trachomatis has limited their wider use, and there is a clear requirement for more sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic platforms. Hence, the need for an applicable on-site test that offers reasonably sensitive detection," concludes Prof. Langel.
Technical details of the study
Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is a nucleic acid amplification technique (NAAT) – a laboratory technique that involves the in vitro synthesis of many copies of DNA or RNA from one original template. These techniques have revolutionized diagnostic technology. Current technologies that allow the detection of amplification in real time are fast becoming diagnostic industry standards.
C. trachomatis cells contain plasmids (small DNA molecules that are separate from chromosomal DNA) that have a number of coding sequences. For identification and amplification by RPA, researchers selected a gene fragment within a gene (CDS2) that was conserved across sexually transmitted C. trachomatis strains. The assay does not require the purification of total DNA from the urine sample. Heating the sample for five minutes at 90°C is enough to release a sufficient amount of the amplification target to determine whether the pathogen is present. Urine contains polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors, but up to 5 μl of urine can be added without affecting sensitivity of the RPA, whereas the addition of 10 μl affects amplification efficiency significantly.
The C. trachomatis assay developed here was able to detect at least 50 copies of the CDS2 target. C. trachomatis harbors, on average, between four and ten copies of the plasmid per elementary body depending on the strain and development stage. The lowest detectable amount of the C. trachomatis RPA assay can therefore be translated to 5 to 12 pathogens per reaction and is in the same range as other nucleic acid amplification-based techniques.
The assay was tested on urine samples from 70 patients (51 females and 19 males) attending a sexual health clinic in Estonia. The samples were tested in parallel using RPA and Roche Cobas Amplicor C. trachomatis assays.
Fifty-eight samples tested negative in both assays. As no false negatives were detected, the clinical specificity of the C. trachomatis RPA assay can be estimated at 100%.
Twelve of the samples tested as positive using the Roche assay. Of these, 10 tested positive and two tested negative in the RPA reaction. Based on these results, the clinical sensitivity of the RPA assay can be estimated at 83%.
Of the 12 patients who tested positive, three complained of symptoms. The other nine patients were asymptomatic. Of the 58 C. trachomatis-negative patients, 15 (26%) complained of symptoms that could be associated with C. trachomatis infection. One of these tested positive for N. gonorrhoeae and M. genitalium. Others were diagnosed with bladder inflammation (two patients), bacterial vaginosis (five patients), yeast infection (four patients), or abdominal pain of non-gynecological origins (three patients).
# # #
Notes for editors
"Sensitive and rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by recombinase polymerase amplification directly from urine samples," by Katrin Krõlov, Jekaterina Frolova, Oana Tudoran, Julia Suhorutsenko, Taavi Lehto, Hiljar Sibul, Imre Mäger, Made Laanpere, Indrek Tulp, and Ülo Langel, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.08.003. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, Volume 16, Issue 1 (January 2014) published by Elsevier.
Full text of the article is available to credentialed journalists upon request; contact Eileen Leahy at +1 732 238 3628 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Journalists wishing to interview the authors should contact Katrin Krõlov, University of Tartu, at email@example.com or Indrek Tulp, Selfdiagnotics Ltd., at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Supported by grant EU32415 from Enterprise Estonia (European Regional Development Fund) and grants SF0140031Bs09 (I.T.) and SF0180027s08 (J.S., H.S., T.L., I.M., and Ü.L.) from Estonian Ministry of Education and Research and funding from Selfdiagnostics OÜ.
About The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, (http://jmd.amjpathol.org), the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology, co-published by the American Society for Investigative Pathology, seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods for diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, with an Impact Factor of 3.952, ranks 15th among 77 journals in Pathology, according to 2012 Journal Citation Reports® Thomson Reuters, 2013.
Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solutions that enhance the performance of science, health, and technology professionals, empowering them to make better decisions, deliver better care, and sometimes make groundbreaking discoveries that advance the boundaries of knowledge and human progress. Elsevier provides web-based, digital solutions — among them ScienceDirect, Scopus, Elsevier Research Intelligence,and ClinicalKey—and publishes over 2,200 journals, including The Lancet and Cell, and over 33,000 book titles, including a number of iconic reference works.
The company is part of Reed Elsevier Group PLC, a world leading provider of professional information solutions in the Science, Medical, Legal and Risk and Business sectors, which is jointly owned by Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. The ticker symbols are REN (Euronext Amsterdam), REL (London Stock Exchange), RUK and ENL (New York Stock Exchange).