Roundtable: What are the barriers to scientific independence in Africa?
Policymakers, publishers and nonprofits gather in UK Parliament to debate problems and solutions
By Ylann Schemm Posted on 12 November 2013
While many emerging regions have invested heavily in science and technology, Africa is falling behind in the race for scientific development, with the lowest enrollment rate for higher education in the world. To explore this problem and find solutions, 50 policymakers, scientists, journalists, publishers and representatives from nonprofit organizations gathered in the UK House of Parliament October 21 for an intensive debate on Africa, science and academic publishing.
The roundtable was organized by the Planet Earth Institute (PEI), a young nonprofit supporting the development of Africa's scientific independence. They asked the audience three key questions on the threats and opportunities of open access, the standards and qualities of African journals and research capacity building. The informal "You Decide" poll yielded these results:
- 100% thought that the open access revolution was an opportunity, not a threat, for scientific development in Africa.
- 78% said standards for African journals should be the same as those in Europe, although that slipped to 68% after the discussion.
- By far the biggest barrier for researchers to get published was lack of training, polling 47% of the vote and more than double the score of any other listed barrier.
- Rt Hon. the Lord Paul Boateng, a member of the UK Parliament and a PEI trustee (Chair),
- Ethiopian Ambassador HE Berhanu Kebede
- Dr. Alicia Wise, Director of Universal Access at Elsevier
- Susan Murray, Director of African Journals OnLine
- Dr. Tim Wheeler, Professor of Crop Science at the University of Reading and Deputy Chief Scientific Adviser for the Department for International Development (DFID) in the UK.
Here is a selection of perspectives and points raised both inside the room and on Twitter (#scienceAfrica):
- Lord Paul Boateng, a trustee of PEI who chaired the panel as a leading figure on Africa and its development, called for the need to develop a comprehensive mentoring program between African diaspora scientists and research scientists in Africa.
- As with the work of all individual scientists, African research should be assessed using a broad range of metrics as recommended by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment: The Journal Impact Factor should be just one of many presented in the larger context of metrics available (e.g., 5-year impact factor, Eigenfactor, SCImago, h-index, editorial and publication times, etc.) to provide a richer view of journal performance.)
- Dr. Alicia Wise, Director of Universal Access at Elsevier, noted that recent Scopus research looking at African research output from 1996 to 2012 demonstrated that the number of research papers published in scientific journals with at least one African author more than quadrupled (from about 12,500 to over 52,000). During the same time the share of the world's articles with African authors almost doubled from 1.2% to around 2.3%.
- This positive trend provides only partial insight into the work being done by African scientists. Much critical research remains unpublished as "gray literature," largely inaccessible beyond the walls of an institution. Much African research is also published in local, regional and national journals that are not yet indexed as part of Scopus or Thomson's Web of Science. One of the burning questions: How can we raise the standards of these African journals to ensure a broader and more collaborative and inclusive global research environment?
- African research may also suffer from a gap in adequate applied research metrics as African researchers often focus their work on tackling critical local issues such as cassava blight rather than blue sky research.
Afterwards, James Knight, PEI's Policy & Communications Director, commented:
The clearest outcome for me is how we need to continue to drive engagement between those experts working in this area, across academia and publishing, with the broader development agenda in Africa. These issues, of getting scientists trained, published and globally networked are not just important for academics but for all of us working on the continent. As a charity focused on scientific development in Africa, that's what our #ScienceAfrica campaign is designed to do, and we're inviting everyone interested in science, technology and innovation to get involved and join us.
The Planet Earth Institute
The Planet Earth Institute (PEI) is an international NGO and charity working for the scientific independence of Africa. While other emerging regions have invested heavily in science and technology, Africa is falling behind in the race for scientific development, with the lowest enrollment rate for higher education in the world. To help tackle these problems, the PEI's work is focused around three pathways to achieve Africa's scientific independence – Higher Education, Technological Innovation and Policy and Advocacy.
The Policy and Advocacy Pathway demonstrates the PEI's commitment to be a strong voice for the role of science, higher education and technology in Africa's sustainable development in policy institutions across the world. Primarily facilitated via the PEI Partners Forum, which organized the roundtable, this work draws on both the PEI's experience in Africa and the insights and capabilities of the PEI Partners, a group of organizations committed to investing in science, higher education and technology for sustainable development.[divider]
- Planet Earth Institute's #ScienceAfrica Campaign
- Universal Access initiatives at Elsevier
- "Open access in Africa — changes and challenges: Elsevier's Director of Access Relations writes about his work with the African Academy of Science in Kenya"
- San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) – Elsevier's view
- Elsevier Connect articles for Open Access Week 2013
- The Elsevier Foundation
Ylann Schemm (@ylannschemm) drives Elsevier's corporate responsibility programs which focus on research capacity building in the developing world and advancing women in science. She manages the Elsevier Foundation's Innovative Libraries in Developing Countries Program which provides additional infrastructure-building, medical library needs assessments, preservation of unique research and training to boost information literacy and research skills to enable the optimum use of Research4Life. Ylann also chairs the Research4Life partnership's Communications and Marketing working group.
By Ian Evans | Posted on 23 Jun 2014
Nigeria-Elsevier agreement gives 79 institutions first-time access to research management and analytics toolsBy Anne Linton and Alexandra Gomes | Posted on 25 Mar 2014
A team from George Washington University helps the University of Malawi College of Medicine update its information infrastructureBy Ylann Schemm | Posted on 13 Jan 2014
What factors are driving the increase in scientific research being conducted by African scientists?By David Tempest | Posted on 04 Jun 2013
Elsevier’s Director of Access Relations writes about his work with the African Academy of Science in KenyaBy Andrew Plume, PhD | Posted on 03 Jun 2013
Elsevier supports those elements of DORA that reflect long known problems with Impact Factors, and in which we have been actively supporting a range of alternatives and best practices. Elsevier is not signing DORA in its entirety, however, as it’s not our place to advocate for positions that are primarily aimed at other partners in the research community. Mendeley is signing DORA on its own.