 |
 | 
|  |
 |  |  |
 |
 |
|
The last time Editors Update focused on ScienceDirect was in 2002. “Four years
is a long time, especially in electronic publishing, and an awful lot has
happened to ScienceDirect in that time,” says Joep Verheggen, Director of
ScienceDirect. “To give you an impression, in 2002, 80 million articles were
downloaded from ScienceDirect, while during 2006, there were more than 300
million downloads. The number of visitors to the website has also doubled
between 2004 and 2006.”
Easy access
Access to reliable sources of information has
traditionally been cited as a key issue within the scientific community.
“Before the advent of the Web, the publishing industry had been stable for a
very long time,” Verheggen continues. “Researchers had to visit libraries and
wade through mountains of information to find what they were looking for. One
of the biggest advances in recent years was our US$ 40 million project to
digitize Elsevier’s entire back catalogue of journals - right back to the
first ever issue of The Lancet, from 1823 - and offer this as the Backfiles
Collection on ScienceDirect.”
|
|  |
 |  |  |
 |
 |
|
The transition from publishing in print to a combination of print and
electronic publishing, or electronic publishing alone, has been relatively
quick and successful, making access to scientific information easier than
ever. Elsevier took the lead in this respect, although other publishers are
now following the same course. In November 2006, for example, the
one-billionth article was downloaded from ScienceDirect, which now has almost
eight million articles available online. One the advantages of ScienceDirect
for editors and reviewers is that it provides an overview of papers published
in specific fields, which helps them in their crucial role as the gatekeepers
of scientific review material.
Latest upgrades
Each year, at least two new software releases
are introduced on the ScienceDirect website, but 2006 was a special year. “We
took a more fundamental approach in 2006 and focused on the navigational path
and overall design of ScienceDirect,” Verheggen explains. “We took a step back
and asked ‘what do people really want from ScienceDirect?’. We talked to end
users and came up with various concepts and prototypes. The result of all this
is a dramatically simplified navigational scheme that makes it far easier to
go directly to the desired article and to personalize settings and alerts. We
changed the whole layout of the home page to make it more intuitive, dynamic
and simple, and we made similar upgrades to the journal home pages. Overall,
we looked at the number of clicks needed to perform key tasks, which we have
reduced by up to 80% in some cases. This improves the productivity and
efficiency of the website, and we’ve also added some extra personalization
features, such as Favorites, bookmarks and a memory of recent actions.”
Perhaps the most useful new feature from an Elsevier editor’s perspective is
the enhancement of the ‘quick search’ function. “This allows editors and
users, for whom ScienceDirect is primarily designed, to find all sources for a
particular author or article quickly and easily,” Verheggen adds.
Added value
More than any other, the scientific community has
embraced the concept of accessing information online. “ScienceDirect’s aim is
to get information to users quicker, so they can spend more time analyzing it,
rather than searching for it,” says Verheggen.
So far, customer feedback on the improvements has been very positive. “We
showed the new design and features to the press at a fairly early stage and
they were very impressed,” Verheggen continues. “They agreed that we’d
achieved what we set out to do and the latest reports from the market place
have also been very positive. The message we’re getting is that we’ve made
some great improvements to the site.”
Investing in the future
The World Wide Web is increasingly
becoming an arena for social groups and networking, which are being
accommodated in an extension to the Web, known as the Web 2.0. “At
ScienceDirect, we’re also interested in these developments,” says Verheggen.
“We have set up our own program, called ScienceDirect 2.0, which is a
cooperation between Elsevier’s product development and marketing teams and the
publishing organization. We’re also looking at further opportunities in
relation to the so-called ‘semantic Web’. So far, we have come up with eight
concepts, which we are discussing with development partners, customers and
users. We’re asking them which concepts are the most important to them and
identifying a priority list for a ScienceDirect 2.0 innovation program. We’re
currently building prototypes and developing a business case, and we aim to
develop a number of concepts as part of this program during 2007 and 2008.”
|
|  |
 |  |  |
 |
 |
|
While work is being conducted on the website redesign and ScienceDirect 2.0,
Verheggen and his team have also been looking at the underlying infrastructure
that supports ScienceDirect. “In January 2007, we will replace the current
search engine with a new one, which brings ScienceDirect’s search capabilities
in line with the most modern search engines,” says Verheggen. “FAST ESPTM is a
product name, but it is really fast and is already used on the Scirus and
Scopus websites. It provides more flexibility and greater speed, as well as
new types of functionality.”
The redesign of ScienceDirect, the switch to the FAST search engine and the
beginning of ScienceDirect 2.0 development are all additional activities to
the standard annual software releases. “This means that we’re continuing to
invest significantly in ScienceDirect, to the tune of multi-million dollars,
in fact,” says Verheggen. “In addition, we’re working on an Access &
Entitlement project, which should be completed by the end of 2007 or the
beginning of 2008. This will provide customers with greater options and
control over the content they wish to access, along with a better customer
service experience for our users.”
Intercompatibility
Elsevier’s three main web-based scientific
resources are ScienceDirect, Scirus and Scopus. “ScienceDirect is a full-text
journal-based platform; Scopus is a web-based abstract and citation database
with sophisticated search, retrieval and analysis features; while Scirus is
Elsevier’s free scientific Web search engine,” Verheggen explains. “Scirus and
Scopus index the full-text articles included on ScienceDirect’s database (and
many other e-journal platforms), and make the abstracts of these articles
available to users. With the appropriate entitlement, however, users can
easily make the link to ScienceDirect to gain access to the full article.”
In the pipeline
Maintaining ScienceDirect’s reputation as a
cutting-edge resource requires upgrading its architecture and technology at
regular intervals. “In addition to all of the above improvements, we’re also
working on improving the quality of images included in electronic versions of
papers,” Verheggen explains. “In print, you can produce excellent images and
we’re trying to bring ScienceDirect’s electronic images up to the same
standard.”
“We’re also trying to increase the speed of publication to make titles
accessible as quickly as possible. To this end, we’re making early versions of
papers from a selected group of titles available after they’ve been peer
reviewed, but before they’ve been through the technical editing process – the
so-called Author Manuscript. During 2007 we will also launch the e-books
program, which is a large extension of the current books program on
ScienceDirect. From May onwards we will load an additional 3500-4000 book
titles on to the ScienceDirect backlist and frontlist. Finally, we’ve also
introduced an Ambassador Program, which enables Elsevier editors to gain
access to article and book titles that they might not otherwise be able to
access.”
|
|  |
 |  |  |
 |
 |
|
|  |